Committed now.
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Erick Erickson <[email protected]> wrote: > Michael: Good catch. Have I mentioned lately that Git and I don't get > along? Apparently I was in some weird state when I tried to push. > > Ishan: Many apologies, but I'll have to push again, is it too late to > re-spin? > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Here are the logs of two failed runs, FYI. >> http://textsearch.io/tests.log.gz (kernel: 4.13.5-200.fc26.x86_64) >> http://textsearch.io/tests2.log.gz (kernel: 4.13.5-200.fc26.x86_64) >> >> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> FYI, I've been struggling to run tests for past 4-5 hours. About 10-15 >>> of them failed on every run; I tried all the branches, variety of different >>> machines (Intel i7 Haswell-E, Ryzen 1700, Threadripper 1950X). My JDK >>> version on all of these are 8u144. >>> >>> Finally, figured out that all my machines had the latest >>> 4.12.14-300.fc26.x86_64 or 4.13.5-200.fc26.x86_64 kernels. When I >>> downgraded the kernel to 4.11.6-201.fc25.x86_64, the tests started running >>> as usual. Now, I'll try to build the RC for 6.6.2 on this kernel. Is this a >>> known issue? >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 6:26 AM, Erick Erickson <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Done both for 6.6 and 6x >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sure Erick, please go ahead. >>>>> I'll start the release later today. >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ishan >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Erick Erickson < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ishan: >>>>>> >>>>>> I have 11297 ready to rock-n-roll, it's just a matter of pushing it. >>>>>> Give me a few. >>>>>> >>>>>> The thing I'm not clear on is what to do with CHANGES.txt. Currently >>>>>> it's in 7.0.1 and 7.1. >>>>>> >>>>>> I propose adding a 6.6.2 section to 6x and including it there and >>>>>> leaving it in the 7.0.1 and 7.1 sections of master. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll do it that way, you can change it if you want unless I hear back >>>>>> from you sooner. >>>>>> >>>>>> Erick >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Allison, Timothy B. < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Sounds good. Thank you! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *From:* Ishan Chattopadhyaya [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, October 13, 2017 5:25 PM >>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: 6.6.2 Release >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Any chance we could get SOLR-11450 in? I understand if the answer >>>>>>> is no. 😊 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Currently, I want to have this release out as soon as possible so as >>>>>>> to mitigate the risk exposure of the security vulnerability. Since this >>>>>>> is >>>>>>> not committed yet, I'd vote for leaving this out and possibly having it >>>>>>> included in a later release, if needed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 to SOLR-11297. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 2:32 AM, David Smiley < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Suggested criteria for bug-fix release issues: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * fixes a bug :-) and doesn't harm backwards-compatibility in >>>>>>> the process >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * helps users upgrade to later versions >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * documentation >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 to SOLR-11297 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm not sure on SOLR-11450. Seems it might introduce a back-compat >>>>>>> issue? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:40 PM Erick Erickson < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd also like to get SOLR-11297 in if there are no objections. Ditto >>>>>>> if the answer is no.... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's quite a safe fix though. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Allison, Timothy B. < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any chance we could get SOLR-11450 in? I understand if the answer >>>>>>> is no. 😊 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *From:* Ishan Chattopadhyaya [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, October 13, 2017 4:23 PM >>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>> *Subject:* 6.6.2 Release >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In light of [0], we need a 6.6.2 release as soon as possible. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd like to volunteer to RM for this release, unless someone else >>>>>>> wants to do so or has an objection. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ishan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [0] - https://lucene.apache.org/solr/news.html#12-october-2017-ple >>>>>>> ase-secure-your-apache-solr-servers-since-a-zero-day-exploit >>>>>>> -has-been-reported-on-a-public-mailing-list >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: >>>>>>> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
