On 7/3/06, Chad Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Despite the pleasant sounding words on this page, eric's emails and
offense
at me even mentioning NeoOffice, and the continued insistence that I give
"equal time" if not complete worship to, the Mac OS X11 team, prove that
"we" in fact *DO* have argument with NeoOffice, and DON'T wish them the
best
in their efforts.

And here is the reason why I will not promote, support, condone,
advertise,
or push in any way any end user to even think about trying the X11 port -


Whats wrong with the X11 port? We have been uisng it and there has been no
problems, unlike in  Neo Office.

The "growing number of questions" is a direct result of removing the
NeoOffice links.  People had no problems installing NeoOffice when it was
there.  But since they removed the links, you get to see how damn hard it
is
to install X11 for a Mac End User.  Even if someone had tried to download
and install the X11 port, upon failing to get it to do anything other than
jump up and down in the dock for a few minutes - they would return to the
Mac OS X page, and download NeoOffice, which, of course, worked just fine.



I fail to see how installing X is very difficult, its in the installation
cd. It took me less than 15 minutes to install everything all together.
Neo office does not deliver the same product as OOo. If it were not for the
X11 port I would have had to spend thousands of dollars on MS Office 2004
for our the mac minis we're using just so that we have a decent office
suite. I tried Neo Office, but I did could not do what I needed (which is
very basic stuff mind you).

Charles

Reply via email to