Hi Per, all,
Per Eriksson wrote:
John McCreesh skrev:
On Mon, July 13, 2009 19:03, Per Eriksson wrote:
[snip]
I would start an effort to make the why site much simpler. More like a
guide. If you are a specific role this is covered on different more
in-depth pages.
John, I'd be happy to provide a sketch with my ideas for the why site.
Go for it. [...]
http://erinet.se/why/
Okay here is my quick outline. [...]
I like it (and support Andy's point about "coolness").
But I'm not quite sure if the four points mentioned (and the ranking
among them) will be the most attractive reasons for not yet convinced
new users for OpenOffice.org.
What about
"Future proof file format" or something like that?
Are new features really our top-level reason to use OOo?
For me personally the existing features, covering all necessary tasks,
are more important.
The second point would be extensions, after that new features.
Then security, file format and openness.
But these are just my personal thoughts - not necessarily more valuable
than any other ...
Best regards
Bernhard
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
