thereof? Does anyone hate it? > > I'm just a bit behind on mail, but need a clarification - in Maven the XSD is > an end result of the model that is generated, but you seem to describe it > here as an input. Am I misreading?
I've been assuming that the XSD file is a manual production, but I didn't actually check. I guess that modello might be in the business of excreting XSD files, too. So my more recent email is a bit wrong. > > If you're suggesting a change to the model that is backwards compat API-wise > with 4.0.0, and has identical behaviour (or graceful degradation) when read > from the repository by <= 3.0.3, then I don't see any problem with a > particular change. Yes, that's precisely the idea. Some new accessors appear in the model, and if you don't bother them, they won't bother you. > > - Brett > > -- > Brett Porter > br...@apache.org > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
