On 13 January 2014 16:13, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote:

> Why isn't this copied to the dev list?
>

It was, check the headers


>
>
> I don't see why  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3879 is even
> remotely under consideration.


I moved MNG-3879 to 4.0 backlog.

Your action was to split out the second issue... should really live in the
dependency plugin and depend on MNG-3879

> The second part is a goal that I would propose to call 'dependency-map'.
This would produce a formatted map of the dependency tree – enriched, of
course, by the comments in the first part.



> It is a proposal, to start with, to add
> an element to the POM:
>
> <dependency>
>             <explanation>some text </explanation>
>             ...
> </dependency>
>
> which would make it a job for 4.0. It was never my intention to
> propose to capture <!-- --> XML comments, that's evil in my view.
>
> So far, the feedback I've received is that the stuff I've written
> about POM evolution is crap. Fine, it's crap.


I don't think necessarily so... once 3.2.0 is out we will be looking at
model version 5.0.0 and pom evolution is on the cards. I like the idea of
dedicated documentation nodes in the pom as otherwise it can be harder to
maintain comments etc, when people use formatting tools etc. The great
thing with a descriptive text node is that everyone except tooling can
ignore it


> So JIRAs like this
> should just be closed down when they have my name on them.
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Stephen Connolly
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I have added a wiki page summary of this discussion:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+3.2.0+Bug+Scrub
> >
> > Reminder, I pegged some action items against Benson, Olivier, Kristian &
> > Jason... See the action required section... mostly just status updates.
> >
> >
> > On 7 January 2014 22:03, Stephen Connolly <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I like "Nike" style issues (just commit it)
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tuesday, 7 January 2014, Michael Osipov wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Am 2014-01-07 22:38, schrieb Stephen Connolly:
> >>>>
> >>>> Add it if you promise to implement it, otherwise put it against 3.2.x
> >>>> for
> >>>> the patch releases.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> That is not going to be a problem because I have a patch and can commit
> >>> right away.
> >>>
> >>>> On Tuesday, 7 January 2014, Michael Osipov wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Am 2014-01-07 16:25, schrieb Stephen Connolly:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> OK we are now at 38 open issues.... anyone else feel like scrubbing
> >>>>>> some
> >>>>>> more?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'd like to add another issue to 3.2:
> >>>>> https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5176 Print build times in an
> ISO
> >>>>> 8601-style manner
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It adds readability to the time output.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Mike
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sent from my phone
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to