Done. On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Stephen Connolly > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 13 January 2014 16:13, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Why isn't this copied to the dev list? >> >> >> It was, check the headers > > I see. GMail has learned a new prank, which is to skip 'dev' in the > brief listing of who is on the email. > >> >>> >>> >>> >>> I don't see why http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3879 is even >>> remotely under consideration. >> >> >> I moved MNG-3879 to 4.0 backlog. >> >> Your action was to split out the second issue... should really live in the >> dependency plugin and depend on MNG-3879 > > OK, seems less that wildly important, but I'll do it. > >> >>> The second part is a goal that I would propose to call 'dependency-map'. >>> This would produce a formatted map of the dependency tree – enriched, of >>> course, by the comments in the first part. >> >> >>> >>> It is a proposal, to start with, to add >>> an element to the POM: >>> >>> <dependency> >>> <explanation>some text </explanation> >>> ... >>> </dependency> >>> >>> which would make it a job for 4.0. It was never my intention to >>> propose to capture <!-- --> XML comments, that's evil in my view. >>> >>> So far, the feedback I've received is that the stuff I've written >>> about POM evolution is crap. Fine, it's crap. >> >> >> I don't think necessarily so... once 3.2.0 is out we will be looking at >> model version 5.0.0 and pom evolution is on the cards. I like the idea of >> dedicated documentation nodes in the pom as otherwise it can be harder to >> maintain comments etc, when people use formatting tools etc. The great thing >> with a descriptive text node is that everyone except tooling can ignore it >> >>> >>> So JIRAs like this >>> should just be closed down when they have my name on them. >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Stephen Connolly >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > I have added a wiki page summary of this discussion: >>> > >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+3.2.0+Bug+Scrub >>> > >>> > Reminder, I pegged some action items against Benson, Olivier, Kristian & >>> > Jason... See the action required section... mostly just status updates. >>> > >>> > >>> > On 7 January 2014 22:03, Stephen Connolly >>> > <[email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> I like "Nike" style issues (just commit it) >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Tuesday, 7 January 2014, Michael Osipov wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 2014-01-07 22:38, schrieb Stephen Connolly: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Add it if you promise to implement it, otherwise put it against 3.2.x >>> >>>> for >>> >>>> the patch releases. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> That is not going to be a problem because I have a patch and can >>> >>> commit >>> >>> right away. >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Tuesday, 7 January 2014, Michael Osipov wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> Am 2014-01-07 16:25, schrieb Stephen Connolly: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>> OK we are now at 38 open issues.... anyone else feel like scrubbing >>> >>>>>> some >>> >>>>>> more? >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> I'd like to add another issue to 3.2: >>> >>>>> https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5176 Print build times in an >>> >>>>> ISO >>> >>>>> 8601-style manner >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> It adds readability to the time output. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Mike >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Sent from my phone >>> > >>> > >> >>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
