OK, 4 days and no objections... these are being pushed out of scope for 3.2.0
On 13 January 2014 18:07, Stephen Connolly <[email protected]>wrote: > The following issues I proposed to move to 4.x. I have not heard anything > to the contrary... shall I pull the trigger on these? > > - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4622 Throw Validation Error if > pom contains a dependency with two different versions. > - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-683 Lifecycle mappings should > specify phase bindings in terms of general functionality type > > > - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-841 Support customization of > default excludes > > > - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-193 symmetry for outputs of a > plugin > > > - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3695 Allow dependencies' scopes > to be managed without explicit versions > - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3825 Dependencies with > classifier should not always require a version. > - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3321 Skip plugin and/or execution > - > - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1569 Make build process info > read-only to mojos, and provide mechanism for explicit out-params for mojos > to declare > > > - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1867 deprecate system scope, > analyse other use cases > - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4508 No way to avoid adding > artifactId to site urls > > > I would like some discussion on this one before making a call one way or > the other > > - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4173 Remove automatic version > resolution for POM plugins > > > > > > > On 13 January 2014 18:02, Stephen Connolly < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> wiki updated ;-) >> >> >> On 13 January 2014 17:56, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Done. >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Benson Margulies >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Stephen Connolly >>> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> On 13 January 2014 16:13, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Why isn't this copied to the dev list? >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> It was, check the headers >>> > >>> > I see. GMail has learned a new prank, which is to skip 'dev' in the >>> > brief listing of who is on the email. >>> > >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> I don't see why http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3879 is even >>> >>> remotely under consideration. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> I moved MNG-3879 to 4.0 backlog. >>> >> >>> >> Your action was to split out the second issue... should really live >>> in the >>> >> dependency plugin and depend on MNG-3879 >>> > >>> > OK, seems less that wildly important, but I'll do it. >>> > >>> >> >>> >>> The second part is a goal that I would propose to call >>> 'dependency-map'. >>> >>> This would produce a formatted map of the dependency tree – >>> enriched, of >>> >>> course, by the comments in the first part. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> It is a proposal, to start with, to add >>> >>> an element to the POM: >>> >>> >>> >>> <dependency> >>> >>> <explanation>some text </explanation> >>> >>> ... >>> >>> </dependency> >>> >>> >>> >>> which would make it a job for 4.0. It was never my intention to >>> >>> propose to capture <!-- --> XML comments, that's evil in my view. >>> >>> >>> >>> So far, the feedback I've received is that the stuff I've written >>> >>> about POM evolution is crap. Fine, it's crap. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> I don't think necessarily so... once 3.2.0 is out we will be looking >>> at >>> >> model version 5.0.0 and pom evolution is on the cards. I like the >>> idea of >>> >> dedicated documentation nodes in the pom as otherwise it can be >>> harder to >>> >> maintain comments etc, when people use formatting tools etc. The >>> great thing >>> >> with a descriptive text node is that everyone except tooling can >>> ignore it >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> So JIRAs like this >>> >>> should just be closed down when they have my name on them. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Stephen Connolly >>> >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > I have added a wiki page summary of this discussion: >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+3.2.0+Bug+Scrub >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Reminder, I pegged some action items against Benson, Olivier, >>> Kristian & >>> >>> > Jason... See the action required section... mostly just status >>> updates. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > On 7 January 2014 22:03, Stephen Connolly >>> >>> > <[email protected]> >>> >>> > wrote: >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> I like "Nike" style issues (just commit it) >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> On Tuesday, 7 January 2014, Michael Osipov wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 2014-01-07 22:38, schrieb Stephen Connolly: >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> Add it if you promise to implement it, otherwise put it against >>> 3.2.x >>> >>> >>>> for >>> >>> >>>> the patch releases. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> That is not going to be a problem because I have a patch and can >>> >>> >>> commit >>> >>> >>> right away. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Tuesday, 7 January 2014, Michael Osipov wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>>> Am 2014-01-07 16:25, schrieb Stephen Connolly: >>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>> OK we are now at 38 open issues.... anyone else feel like >>> scrubbing >>> >>> >>>>>> some >>> >>> >>>>>> more? >>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> I'd like to add another issue to 3.2: >>> >>> >>>>> https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5176 Print build times >>> in an >>> >>> >>>>> ISO >>> >>> >>>>> 8601-style manner >>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> It adds readability to the time output. >>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> Mike >>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> -- >>> >>> >> Sent from my phone >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >
