Done.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Benson Margulies
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Stephen Connolly
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 13 January 2014 16:13, Benson Margulies <[email protected]>
wrote:
>>>
>>> Why isn't this copied to the dev list?
>>
>>
>> It was, check the headers
>
> I see. GMail has learned a new prank, which is to skip 'dev' in the
> brief listing of who is on the email.
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't see why http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3879 is even
>>> remotely under consideration.
>>
>>
>> I moved MNG-3879 to 4.0 backlog.
>>
>> Your action was to split out the second issue... should really
live
in the
>> dependency plugin and depend on MNG-3879
>
> OK, seems less that wildly important, but I'll do it.
>
>>
>>> The second part is a goal that I would propose to call
'dependency-map'.
>>> This would produce a formatted map of the dependency tree –
enriched, of
>>> course, by the comments in the first part.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> It is a proposal, to start with, to add
>>> an element to the POM:
>>>
>>> <dependency>
>>> <explanation>some text </explanation>
>>> ...
>>> </dependency>
>>>
>>> which would make it a job for 4.0. It was never my intention to
>>> propose to capture <!-- --> XML comments, that's evil in my view.
>>>
>>> So far, the feedback I've received is that the stuff I've written
>>> about POM evolution is crap. Fine, it's crap.
>>
>>
>> I don't think necessarily so... once 3.2.0 is out we will be
looking
at
>> model version 5.0.0 and pom evolution is on the cards. I like the
idea of
>> dedicated documentation nodes in the pom as otherwise it can be
harder to
>> maintain comments etc, when people use formatting tools etc. The
great thing
>> with a descriptive text node is that everyone except tooling can
ignore it
>>
>>>
>>> So JIRAs like this
>>> should just be closed down when they have my name on them.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Stephen Connolly
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > I have added a wiki page summary of this discussion:
>>> >
>>> >
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+3.2.0+Bug+Scrub
>>> >
>>> > Reminder, I pegged some action items against Benson, Olivier,
Kristian &
>>> > Jason... See the action required section... mostly just status
updates.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 7 January 2014 22:03, Stephen Connolly
>>> > <[email protected]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> I like "Nike" style issues (just commit it)
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tuesday, 7 January 2014, Michael Osipov wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Am 2014-01-07 22:38, schrieb Stephen Connolly:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Add it if you promise to implement it, otherwise put it
against 3.2.x
>>> >>>> for
>>> >>>> the patch releases.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> That is not going to be a problem because I have a patch and
can
>>> >>> commit
>>> >>> right away.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> On Tuesday, 7 January 2014, Michael Osipov wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>> Am 2014-01-07 16:25, schrieb Stephen Connolly:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>> OK we are now at 38 open issues.... anyone else feel like
scrubbing
>>> >>>>>> some
>>> >>>>>> more?
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> I'd like to add another issue to 3.2:
>>> >>>>> https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5176 Print build times
in an
>>> >>>>> ISO
>>> >>>>> 8601-style manner
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> It adds readability to the time output.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Mike
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Sent from my phone
>>> >
>>> >
>>
>>
