On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Stephen Connolly <[email protected]> wrote: > On 13 January 2014 16:13, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Why isn't this copied to the dev list? > > > It was, check the headers
I see. GMail has learned a new prank, which is to skip 'dev' in the brief listing of who is on the email. > >> >> >> >> I don't see why http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3879 is even >> remotely under consideration. > > > I moved MNG-3879 to 4.0 backlog. > > Your action was to split out the second issue... should really live in the > dependency plugin and depend on MNG-3879 OK, seems less that wildly important, but I'll do it. > >> The second part is a goal that I would propose to call 'dependency-map'. >> This would produce a formatted map of the dependency tree – enriched, of >> course, by the comments in the first part. > > >> >> It is a proposal, to start with, to add >> an element to the POM: >> >> <dependency> >> <explanation>some text </explanation> >> ... >> </dependency> >> >> which would make it a job for 4.0. It was never my intention to >> propose to capture <!-- --> XML comments, that's evil in my view. >> >> So far, the feedback I've received is that the stuff I've written >> about POM evolution is crap. Fine, it's crap. > > > I don't think necessarily so... once 3.2.0 is out we will be looking at > model version 5.0.0 and pom evolution is on the cards. I like the idea of > dedicated documentation nodes in the pom as otherwise it can be harder to > maintain comments etc, when people use formatting tools etc. The great thing > with a descriptive text node is that everyone except tooling can ignore it > >> >> So JIRAs like this >> should just be closed down when they have my name on them. >> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Stephen Connolly >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I have added a wiki page summary of this discussion: >> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+3.2.0+Bug+Scrub >> > >> > Reminder, I pegged some action items against Benson, Olivier, Kristian & >> > Jason... See the action required section... mostly just status updates. >> > >> > >> > On 7 January 2014 22:03, Stephen Connolly >> > <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> I like "Nike" style issues (just commit it) >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, 7 January 2014, Michael Osipov wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Am 2014-01-07 22:38, schrieb Stephen Connolly: >> >>>> >> >>>> Add it if you promise to implement it, otherwise put it against 3.2.x >> >>>> for >> >>>> the patch releases. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> That is not going to be a problem because I have a patch and can >> >>> commit >> >>> right away. >> >>> >> >>>> On Tuesday, 7 January 2014, Michael Osipov wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Am 2014-01-07 16:25, schrieb Stephen Connolly: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> OK we are now at 38 open issues.... anyone else feel like scrubbing >> >>>>>> some >> >>>>>> more? >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I'd like to add another issue to 3.2: >> >>>>> https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5176 Print build times in an >> >>>>> ISO >> >>>>> 8601-style manner >> >>>>> >> >>>>> It adds readability to the time output. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Mike >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Sent from my phone >> > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
