-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19176/#review37364
-----------------------------------------------------------


Bad patch!

Reviews applied: [19176]

Failed command: git apply --index 19176.patch

Error:
 error: patch failed: src/master/master.cpp:605
error: src/master/master.cpp: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: src/slave/slave.cpp:3016
error: src/slave/slave.cpp: patch does not apply


- Mesos ReviewBot


On March 13, 2014, 11:27 p.m., Adam B wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/19176/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 13, 2014, 11:27 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-905
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-905
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Eliminated the Framework.id FrameworkID field in master and slave, and 
> replaced each with a Framework.id() accessor that references 
> Framework.FrameworkInfo.id.
> Some messages (RunTaskMessage, ExecutorRegisteredMessage) will no longer need 
> the FrameworkID member, but it is 'required' and cannot be easily deprecated. 
> Due to rolling upgrades, we must (a) continue to set the FrameworkID in the 
> messages, in case the recipient is on an older version that needs it; and (b) 
> merge the FrameworkID into the FrameworkInfo.id, in case we are receiving a 
> message from an older sender.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/http.cpp a019f15 
>   src/master/master.hpp 49a3e15 
>   src/master/master.cpp 2a40333 
>   src/messages/messages.proto c26a3d0 
>   src/slave/http.cpp 594032d 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp 01b80df 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp 6abb95d 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19176/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check on ubuntu(Mint14)/gcc4.7.2.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Adam B
> 
>

Reply via email to