> On April 1, 2015, 12:55 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/isolators/posix/disk.cpp, lines 416-419
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/32694/diff/2/?file=911373#file911373line416>
> >
> >     Can't you just bind directly into `prctl`?
> >     
> >     E.g.
> >     
> >     ```
> >         Option<lambda::function<int()>> setup = None();
> >     
> >     #ifdef __linux__
> >         setup = lambda::bind(::prctl(PR_SET_PDEATHSIG, SIGKILL));
> >     #endif
> >     
> >         Try<Subprocess> s = subprocess(
> >             "du",
> >             argv,
> >             Subprocess::PATH("/dev/null"),
> >             Subprocess::PIPE(),
> >             Subprocess::PIPE(),
> >             None(),
> >             None(),
> >             setup);
> >     ```

This has slightly different semantics because if prctl fails, the subprocess 
won't be exec'ed. I want to make it a best effort semantics. I liked the idea 
of using lambda here. I tried to use an anonymous struct functor here. But it 
does not work on gcc-4.4.


- Jie


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32694/#review78457
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 31, 2015, 7:32 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/32694/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 31, 2015, 7:32 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Ian Downes, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2462
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2462
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Set death signal for forked du processes for posix/disk isolator.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/isolators/posix/disk.cpp 
> 6e41e2a72cdcf914f2c922fdcb3d267b938e456e 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32694/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jie Yu
> 
>

Reply via email to