-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32694/#review78697
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



src/slave/containerizer/isolators/posix/disk.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/32694/#comment127648>

    I'm still not sure why this is best-effort, since we never expect this to 
fail, can we just return its status code? It would be nice to find out if this 
isn't working as expected.
    
    This is even more important for 'perf' if we don't use the existing 'sleep' 
commend, since we don't want to run a long-running 'perf' if we can't set the 
death signal.


- Ben Mahler


On April 1, 2015, 7:40 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/32694/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 1, 2015, 7:40 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Ian Downes, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2462
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2462
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Set death signal for forked du processes for posix/disk isolator.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/isolators/posix/disk.cpp 
> 6e41e2a72cdcf914f2c922fdcb3d267b938e456e 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32694/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jie Yu
> 
>

Reply via email to