+1 bi-weekly -- *Marco Massenzio* Distributed Systems Engineer http://codetrips.com
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Yong Qiao Wang <yq...@cn.ibm.com> wrote: > +1 for bi-weekly. > > Regards! > > Yong Qiao Wang（王勇桥） > > > > From: Jojy Varghese <j...@mesosphere.io> > To: dev@mesos.apache.org > Date: 16/10/2015 09:01 > Subject: Re: Community Sync Interval > > > > +1 bi-weekly > > > > On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Isabel Jimenez > <contact.isabeljime...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > +1 for bi-weekly > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Rukletsov <a...@mesosphere.com> > wrote: > > > >> +1 for bi-weekly. > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg > <elizab...@mesosphere.io > >>> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 Weekly > >>> > >>> -Elizabeth > >>> > >>> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann <g...@mesosphere.io> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a bit to > >> see > >>>> how people are liking it. > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu <gyliu...@gmail.com > >>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> +1 for bi-weekly > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> > >>>>> Guangya > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer < > >> dmer...@fantoccini.com > >>>> <javascript:;>> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can > >> always > >>>>> reset > >>>>>> to biweekly. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya <ka...@mesosphere.io > >>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht <j...@mesosphere.io > >>>> <javascript:;>> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> +1 for weekly. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan < > >>>>>> ar...@mesosphere.io <javascript:;>> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent < > >> haosd...@gmail.com > >>>> <javascript:;>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park < > >>>> mcyp...@gmail.com <javascript:;> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly > >> or > >>>>>>> bi-weekly > >>>>>>>>>>> (once every 2 weeks). > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> There were differing opinions on the subject during the > >>>>> community > >>>>>>> sync > >>>>>>>>>>> today. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and > >> missing > >>> a > >>>>>>> meeting > >>>>>>>>> won't > >>>>>>>>>>> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved > >> in > >>>>> these > >>>>>>>>>>> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces > >>>>> people's > >>>>>>>> time > >>>>>>>>>>> commitments. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas > >>> you > >>>>>> might > >>>>>>>>> have! > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> MPark. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > >>>>>>>>>> Haosdent Huang > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> *Jan Schlicht* > >>>>>>>> Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > > >
