Hello,

For the user meeting we (GCR) could volunteer demoing our dashboard (if screen 
sharing is possible) and let everyone one know how we use Metron.


Our project is here:

https://github.com/LTW-GCR-CSOC/csoc-installation-scripts/


-Ahmed
_______________________________________________________________
Ahmed Shah (PMP, M. Eng.)
Cybersecurity Analyst & Developer
GCR - Cybersecurity Operations Center
Carleton University - cugcr.com<https://cugcr.com/tiki/lce/index.php>


________________________________
From: Laurens Vets <laur...@daemon.be>
Sent: December 14, 2017 11:24 AM
To: dev@metron.apache.org
Cc: James Sirota
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Community Meetings


Sounds good to me :)

On 2017-12-14 05:59, Otto Fowler wrote:
> Ok,
>
> So we will be concerned with two types of meetings.  I’ll take
> responsibility for calling the meetings and ‘moderation’.
>
> Dev meetings
>  - feedback on how things are going overall
>  - discussions on specific technical problems
>  - discussion of possible improvements
>
> User meetings
>  - demos
>  - user content ( how I’m using metron )
>  - some unavoidable discussion on problems
>  - some requirements gathering triage
>
> ALL
>  - I will call
>  - I will gather input for agenda
>  - I will distribute the agenda
>  - I will distribute the notes to the list and on confluence
>  - No decisions will be made, only discussed and then put to list
>  - besides general nodes, breakout messages for topical discussion or
> decisions
>
>
>
> How does that sound?
>
>
> On December 13, 2017 at 16:41:29, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
> On December 13, 2017 at 16:39:52, James Sirota (jsir...@apache.org)
> wrote:
>
> I can set up a dedicated Zoom room with a recurrent meeting and give
> PMC
> members rights to the room. I think hosting these meetings should not
> be a
> problem. I would vote not to record them, but rather provide the notes
> after the meeting. It's a lot easier to skim through the notes than
> jump
> around in a recording. As Simon mentioned, I would also make it
> explicitly
> clear that the meetings are dev meetings. These are not user Q&A and
> are
> not meant to be overviews of how different features of Metron work. If
> we
> want to do feature demos or provide user content I would want that to
> be in
> its own separate meeting.
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> 13.12.2017, 05:00, "Otto Fowler" <ottobackwa...@gmail.com>:
>> I am ok with just notes and no recording.
>>
>> On December 13, 2017 at 04:37:20, Simon Elliston Ball (
>> si...@simonellistonball.com) wrote:
>>
>> Good points Larry, we would need to get consent from everyone on the
>> call
>> to record to properly comply with regulations in some countries. We
>> would
>> definitely need someone to step up as note taker.
>>
>> Something else to think about is intended audience. Previously we’ve
>> had
>> meeting like this which have been very detailed Dev@ focussed (which
>> is a
>> great thing) but have rather alienated participants in User@ land. We
>> need
>> to make it clear what level we’re talking about to be inclusive.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>>  On 13 Dec 2017, at 00:44, larry mccay <lmc...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Not sure about posting the recordings - you will need to check and
>>> make
>>>  sure that doesn't violate anything.
>>>
>>>  Just a friendly reminder...
>>>  It is important that meetings have notes and a summary that is sent
>>> out
>>>  describing topics to be decided on the mailing list.
>>>  No decisions can be made in the community meeting itself - this
>>> gives
>>>  others in other timezones and commitments review and voice in the
>>
>> decisions.
>>>  If it didn't happen on the mailing lists then it didn't happen. :)
>>>
>>>  On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Simon Elliston Ball <
>>>  si...@simonellistonball.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Yes, I do.
>>>>
>>>>  I suspect the best bet will be to post recordings somewhere on the
>>>>  apache.org <http://apache.org/> metron site.
>>>>
>>>>  Simon
>>>>
>>>>>  On 12 Dec 2017, at 18:36, Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Excellent, do you have the > 40 min + record option?
>>>>>
>>>>>  On December 12, 2017 at 13:19:55, Simon Elliston Ball (
>>>>>  si...@simonellistonball.com) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Happy to volunteer a zoom room. That seems to have worked for most
>>>>> in
>>
>> the
>>>>>  past.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Simon
>>>>>
>>>>>>  On 12 Dec 2017, at 18:09, Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Thanks! I think I’d like something hosted though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On December 12, 2017 at 11:18:52, Ahmed Shah (
>>>>  ahmeds...@cmail.carleton.ca)
>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  wrt "- How are we going to host it"...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I've used BigBlueButton as an end user at our University.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  It is LGPL open source.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  https://bigbluebutton.org/
>>>>>>  https://bigbluebutton.org/developers/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  -Ahmed
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  _______________________________________________________________
>>>>>>  Ahmed Shah (PMP, M. Eng.)
>>>>>>  Cybersecurity Analyst & Developer
>>>>>>  GCR - Cybersecurity Operations Center
>>>>>>  Carleton University -
>>>>>> cugcr.com<https://cugcr.com/tiki/lce/index.php>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  ________________________________
>>>>>>  From: Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>  Sent: December 11, 2017 4:41 PM
>>>>>>  To: dev@metron.apache.org
>>>>>>  Subject: [DISCUSS] Community Meetings
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I think that we all want to have regular community meetings. We
>>>>>> may
> be
>>>>>>  better able to keep to a regular schedule with these meetings if
>>>>>> we
>>>>>  spread
>>>>>>  out the responsibility for them from James and Casey, both of
>>>>>> whom
>>
>> have
>>>>  a
>>>>>>  lot on their plate already.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I would be willing to coordinate and run the meetings, and would
>>
>> welcome
>>>>>>  anyone else who wants to help when they can.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  The only issue for me is I do not have a web-ex account that I
>>>>>> can
> use
>>>>  to
>>>>>>  hold the meeting. So I’ll need some recommendations for a
>>>>>> suitable
>>>>>>  alternative. I have not been able to find an Apache Friendly
>>>>  alternative,
>>>>>>  in the same way that Atlassian is apache friendly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  So - from what I can see we need to:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  - Talk through who is going to do it
>>>>>>  - How are we going to host it
>>>>>>  - When are we going to do it
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Anything else?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  ottO
>
> -------------------
> Thank you,
>
> James Sirota
> PMC- Apache Metron
> jsirota AT apache DOT org

Reply via email to