On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 13:18, Kirk Pepperdine <[email protected]> wrote: > If someone is voting against wouldn’t it be fair to listen to see what the > concern was?
Yes! Maybe saying "+1" was the wrong approach - it is definitely not a vote! I'm trying to suggest a situation where we ask a few other members of the PMC to check and say "all looks good" (also why it's not lazy consensus). If *anyone* highlights a problem with packaging / distribution then that needs addressing. We've voted on the release already, and I see no need to rehash that. Functional issues requiring source changes would need a whole new release and vote anyway. On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 13:06, Eric Barboni <[email protected]> wrote: > I hope that for next round 11.2 maven artefacts can be part of conveniences > for no more bothering for this particular case. The convenience binaries are not part of the vote, whether they're ready in time for it or not. If we're going to assume the release vote is also the binaries oversight then we need to adjust our vote template for next time as well, and link them in / tell people what to do to check them. Personally, I'd prefer to keep the two concerns separate. Although having more of the binaries ready by vote time would be good. That may require some changes to our build infrastructure. Best wishes, Neil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
