On Tue, 23 Jul 2019, 14:25 Daniel Gruno, <[email protected]> wrote:
> If it's not source code, you cannot reliably vote on anything. > Convenience binaries _may_ be added without a vote, but should have > various caveats appended to them. What we should be aiming for here is > reproducible builds... > Thanks Daniel! That was my understanding too. The point of this thread was just to bring a little extra oversight / sanity checking of any binaries we distribute. And +1 to reproducible builds! I guess that could potentially change the voting requirements in future. Best wishes, Neil
