I’d vote against at the moment, since we’d be dependent on nb-javac, the development and ownership of which is indeed a bit fuzzy.
Gj On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 at 13:51, Neil C Smith <neilcsm...@apache.org> wrote: > On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 at 12:31, Geertjan Wielenga > <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 1:25 PM Neil C Smith <neilcsm...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > Multiple people have expressed massive reservations on this already. > > > Michael expressed a -0.99 already. Given code changes are really +1 > > > or -1 anyway, I'll lend the -0.01 until his and other reservations are > > > adequately considered at least. > > > > I thought the objections were to frgraal, not to nb-javac. > > To both - see also > https://lists.apache.org/thread/z0fx3b2vrjx2rqlf07mfr493tqnmc51b > > Some of the reservations brought up about frgaal apply to both too > (non-standard build). > > I share some of the reservations, but also see some of the benefits. > I'm mostly concerned about the distinct lack of consensus on this as a > way forward. > > Maybe a straight vote on this is the way forward, and we live with the > consequences either way?! > > Best wishes, > > Neil > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > >
