In theory adding LSP support should be just as easy since the server does all the heavy lifting.
But if we want to have for example Erlang syntax highlighting, etc. in the first case we just add another 10kb configuration file. In the second case we have to find and ship an Erlang LSP server. --emi Pe 19 iun. 2017, la 12:13, ehsavoie <[email protected]> a scris: > LSP is an API so you would 'only' have to start a process and connect to it > (through input/output stream mostly). > From my point of view a LSP editor is the generic editor you are talking > about, and the LSP server is the file you are loading from. > The advantage is that you have a quick more advanced support of a lot of > languages without even having to support them while you would have to > support every file you are providing. > > > ---------- > Emmanuel Hugonnet > http://www.ehsavoie.com > http://twitter.com/ehsavoie
