Nice, I scanned the document and it describes exact that what I requested How and why: http://wiki.netbeans.org/Schliemann
And here is a proposal how: http://wiki.netbeans.org/SchliemannNBSLanguageDescription But unfortunately it was not implemented, right? I think to create a new file Format doesn’t make sense, I prefer to use that what we have in the document + based on the files from other IDEs, because it is already there. No need to create a new Format for this. Von: Sven Reimers Gesendet: Montag, 19. Juni 2017 17:00 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: Provide basic editor features for more file types out of thebox[WAS: Re: AW: Introductory Email] Who can remember Schliemann Project in NetBeans? Sven Am 19.06.2017 1:08 nachm. schrieb "Emilian Bold" <[email protected]>: > In theory adding LSP support should be just as easy since the server does > all the heavy lifting. > > But if we want to have for example Erlang syntax highlighting, etc. in the > first case we just add another 10kb configuration file. In the second case > we have to find and ship an Erlang LSP server. > > --emi > > Pe 19 iun. 2017, la 12:13, ehsavoie <[email protected]> a scris: > > > LSP is an API so you would 'only' have to start a process and connect to > it > > (through input/output stream mostly). > > From my point of view a LSP editor is the generic editor you are talking > > about, and the LSP server is the file you are loading from. > > The advantage is that you have a quick more advanced support of a lot of > > languages without even having to support them while you would have to > > support every file you are providing. > > > > > > ---------- > > Emmanuel Hugonnet > > http://www.ehsavoie.com > > http://twitter.com/ehsavoie >
