I don’t know as much for this Review, so it would be better if there is someone else who is doing this, with more advanced experiences.
Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10 Von: Geertjan Wielenga Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. September 2017 09:11 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: Allow code contributions or focus on release only? Sure your PR will get merged, just not right now since we're focused on getting Apache NetBeans released. Do you want to join in with the Module Review? Gj On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 at 09:06, Christian Lenz <[email protected]> wrote: > So I should not doing any PR (my #3 PR will not be merged, right?) and I > should do it on Feature Branches? How is the process for Review and > merging? If we have 19275 feature branches, no one knows, when the Feature > is finish. Maybe we should have a release branch where we should merge the > stuff from Feature into release or whatever to make it clear: my Feature is > ready for Review/use etc. > > Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10 > > Von: Geertjan Wielenga > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. September 2017 00:28 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: Allow code contributions or focus on release only? > > Yup -- and corresponds with what we're doing. > > I love it when a plan comes together. > > Gj > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Wade Chandler <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > That all sounds like a good strategy to me. > > > > +1 > > > > Wade > > > > On Sep 26, 2017 17:44, "Craig Russell" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I have no dog in this particular hunt, but if it were up to me I'd > > > prioritize: > > > > > > getting code into repositories with clean RAT reports > > > getting Netbeans to build and run > > > creating release(s) for major platforms > > > ... > > > serious bug reports > > > ... > > > features (in branches) > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > > On Sep 26, 2017, at 1:16 PM, Sven Reimers <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I fully agree with Jan.. > > > > > > > > Let's try to get something released first so we know the process.. > > > > > > > > Hope to have some time to review modules real soon now.. > > > > > > > > -Sven > > > > > > > > Am 26.09.2017 22:13 schrieb "Jan Lahoda" <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > >> +1 (I think that if we want to get some rest and fun, we could use > > > branches > > > >> to experiment with some new features (and I may do so at some > point), > > > but > > > >> we should limit unnecessary changes to master, and use our code > > > >> review/discussion bandwidth as much as possible for working on a > > > release) > > > >> > > > >> I personally even think we could try to release just the platform > > (e.g. > > > >> NetBeans Platform 9.0 beta) once the platform modules are reviewed. > > That > > > >> would help us validate whether the approach we are taking makes > sense > > > (and > > > >> what needs to be improved) and would help us learn about the release > > > >> process (and the platform is a useful thing on its own, so releasing > > it > > > >> wouldn't be just an artificial move). > > > >> > > > >> Jan > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Michael Nascimento < > > [email protected]> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Definitely we should focus on getting an Apache NetBeans release. > > > >>> Sincerely, at this point, I think we should maybe have a Apache > > > NetBeans > > > >>> 9.0 Java edition, so we can have something release and then a full > > > Apache > > > >>> NB 9.0. Otherwise, sounds like we'll get no release this year, > which > > > >> would > > > >>> be pretty sad. > > > >>> > > > >>> Regards, > > > >>> Michael > > > >>> > > > >>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&; > > > >>> utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> > > > >>> Virus-free. > > > >>> www.avg.com > > > >>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&; > > > >>> utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> > > > >>> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > > >>> > > > >>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 4:17 AM, Geertjan Wielenga < > > > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Hi all, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> We need to discuss something, I think -- do we begin accepting > pull > > > >>>> requests, and thereby encourage pull requests to be created -- or > do > > > we > > > >>>> focus very narrowly on preparing Apache NetBeans for its first > > > >> incubator > > > >>>> release? > > > >>>> > > > >>>> If we were to focus narrowly on preparing the Apache release, then > > > this > > > >>> is > > > >>>> what we would focus on, nothing else: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/ > > > >>>> List+of+Modules+to+Review > > > >>>> > > > >>>> At the same time, of course, people want to add their mark to > Apache > > > >>>> NetBeans. And that means code or an icon, a menu item, a new UI > > thing > > > >> to > > > >>>> point at and say -- see, I did that! These kinds of enhancements > > could > > > >> be > > > >>>> done at the same time as the above, and would require that some > > people > > > >>>> split their time between doing the module reviews and reviewing > pull > > > >>>> requests. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I'm not stating a preference here, just putting the discussion out > > > >> there, > > > >>>> since I've seen conflicting opinions about this and I think it > would > > > be > > > >>>> good to discuss this centrally. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Thanks, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Gj > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > Craig L Russell > > > Secretary, Apache Software Foundation > > > [email protected] http://db.apache.org/jdo > > > > > > > > > >
