I have no dog in this particular hunt, but if it were up to me I'd prioritize:
getting code into repositories with clean RAT reports getting Netbeans to build and run creating release(s) for major platforms ... serious bug reports ... features (in branches) Craig > On Sep 26, 2017, at 1:16 PM, Sven Reimers <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I fully agree with Jan.. > > Let's try to get something released first so we know the process.. > > Hope to have some time to review modules real soon now.. > > -Sven > > Am 26.09.2017 22:13 schrieb "Jan Lahoda" <[email protected]>: > >> +1 (I think that if we want to get some rest and fun, we could use branches >> to experiment with some new features (and I may do so at some point), but >> we should limit unnecessary changes to master, and use our code >> review/discussion bandwidth as much as possible for working on a release) >> >> I personally even think we could try to release just the platform (e.g. >> NetBeans Platform 9.0 beta) once the platform modules are reviewed. That >> would help us validate whether the approach we are taking makes sense (and >> what needs to be improved) and would help us learn about the release >> process (and the platform is a useful thing on its own, so releasing it >> wouldn't be just an artificial move). >> >> Jan >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Michael Nascimento <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Definitely we should focus on getting an Apache NetBeans release. >>> Sincerely, at this point, I think we should maybe have a Apache NetBeans >>> 9.0 Java edition, so we can have something release and then a full Apache >>> NB 9.0. Otherwise, sounds like we'll get no release this year, which >> would >>> be pretty sad. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Michael >>> >>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&; >>> utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> >>> Virus-free. >>> www.avg.com >>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&; >>> utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> >>> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 4:17 AM, Geertjan Wielenga < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> We need to discuss something, I think -- do we begin accepting pull >>>> requests, and thereby encourage pull requests to be created -- or do we >>>> focus very narrowly on preparing Apache NetBeans for its first >> incubator >>>> release? >>>> >>>> If we were to focus narrowly on preparing the Apache release, then this >>> is >>>> what we would focus on, nothing else: >>>> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/ >>>> List+of+Modules+to+Review >>>> >>>> At the same time, of course, people want to add their mark to Apache >>>> NetBeans. And that means code or an icon, a menu item, a new UI thing >> to >>>> point at and say -- see, I did that! These kinds of enhancements could >> be >>>> done at the same time as the above, and would require that some people >>>> split their time between doing the module reviews and reviewing pull >>>> requests. >>>> >>>> I'm not stating a preference here, just putting the discussion out >> there, >>>> since I've seen conflicting opinions about this and I think it would be >>>> good to discuss this centrally. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Gj >>>> >>> >> Craig L Russell Secretary, Apache Software Foundation [email protected] http://db.apache.org/jdo
