Definitely we should focus on getting an Apache NetBeans release. Sincerely, at this point, I think we should maybe have a Apache NetBeans 9.0 Java edition, so we can have something release and then a full Apache NB 9.0. Otherwise, sounds like we'll get no release this year, which would be pretty sad.
Regards, Michael <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free. www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 4:17 AM, Geertjan Wielenga < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > We need to discuss something, I think -- do we begin accepting pull > requests, and thereby encourage pull requests to be created -- or do we > focus very narrowly on preparing Apache NetBeans for its first incubator > release? > > If we were to focus narrowly on preparing the Apache release, then this is > what we would focus on, nothing else: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/ > List+of+Modules+to+Review > > At the same time, of course, people want to add their mark to Apache > NetBeans. And that means code or an icon, a menu item, a new UI thing to > point at and say -- see, I did that! These kinds of enhancements could be > done at the same time as the above, and would require that some people > split their time between doing the module reviews and reviewing pull > requests. > > I'm not stating a preference here, just putting the discussion out there, > since I've seen conflicting opinions about this and I think it would be > good to discuss this centrally. > > Thanks, > > Gj >
