That all sounds like a good strategy to me. +1
Wade On Sep 26, 2017 17:44, "Craig Russell" <apache....@gmail.com> wrote: > I have no dog in this particular hunt, but if it were up to me I'd > prioritize: > > getting code into repositories with clean RAT reports > getting Netbeans to build and run > creating release(s) for major platforms > ... > serious bug reports > ... > features (in branches) > > Craig > > > On Sep 26, 2017, at 1:16 PM, Sven Reimers <sven.reim...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I fully agree with Jan.. > > > > Let's try to get something released first so we know the process.. > > > > Hope to have some time to review modules real soon now.. > > > > -Sven > > > > Am 26.09.2017 22:13 schrieb "Jan Lahoda" <lah...@gmail.com>: > > > >> +1 (I think that if we want to get some rest and fun, we could use > branches > >> to experiment with some new features (and I may do so at some point), > but > >> we should limit unnecessary changes to master, and use our code > >> review/discussion bandwidth as much as possible for working on a > release) > >> > >> I personally even think we could try to release just the platform (e.g. > >> NetBeans Platform 9.0 beta) once the platform modules are reviewed. That > >> would help us validate whether the approach we are taking makes sense > (and > >> what needs to be improved) and would help us learn about the release > >> process (and the platform is a useful thing on its own, so releasing it > >> wouldn't be just an artificial move). > >> > >> Jan > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Michael Nascimento <mist...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Definitely we should focus on getting an Apache NetBeans release. > >>> Sincerely, at this point, I think we should maybe have a Apache > NetBeans > >>> 9.0 Java edition, so we can have something release and then a full > Apache > >>> NB 9.0. Otherwise, sounds like we'll get no release this year, which > >> would > >>> be pretty sad. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Michael > >>> > >>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&; > >>> utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> > >>> Virus-free. > >>> www.avg.com > >>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&; > >>> utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> > >>> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 4:17 AM, Geertjan Wielenga < > >>> geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> We need to discuss something, I think -- do we begin accepting pull > >>>> requests, and thereby encourage pull requests to be created -- or do > we > >>>> focus very narrowly on preparing Apache NetBeans for its first > >> incubator > >>>> release? > >>>> > >>>> If we were to focus narrowly on preparing the Apache release, then > this > >>> is > >>>> what we would focus on, nothing else: > >>>> > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/ > >>>> List+of+Modules+to+Review > >>>> > >>>> At the same time, of course, people want to add their mark to Apache > >>>> NetBeans. And that means code or an icon, a menu item, a new UI thing > >> to > >>>> point at and say -- see, I did that! These kinds of enhancements could > >> be > >>>> done at the same time as the above, and would require that some people > >>>> split their time between doing the module reviews and reviewing pull > >>>> requests. > >>>> > >>>> I'm not stating a preference here, just putting the discussion out > >> there, > >>>> since I've seen conflicting opinions about this and I think it would > be > >>>> good to discuss this centrally. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> > >>>> Gj > >>>> > >>> > >> > > Craig L Russell > Secretary, Apache Software Foundation > c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo > >
