Yup -- and corresponds with what we're doing. I love it when a plan comes together.
Gj On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Wade Chandler <[email protected]> wrote: > That all sounds like a good strategy to me. > > +1 > > Wade > > On Sep 26, 2017 17:44, "Craig Russell" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have no dog in this particular hunt, but if it were up to me I'd > > prioritize: > > > > getting code into repositories with clean RAT reports > > getting Netbeans to build and run > > creating release(s) for major platforms > > ... > > serious bug reports > > ... > > features (in branches) > > > > Craig > > > > > On Sep 26, 2017, at 1:16 PM, Sven Reimers <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I fully agree with Jan.. > > > > > > Let's try to get something released first so we know the process.. > > > > > > Hope to have some time to review modules real soon now.. > > > > > > -Sven > > > > > > Am 26.09.2017 22:13 schrieb "Jan Lahoda" <[email protected]>: > > > > > >> +1 (I think that if we want to get some rest and fun, we could use > > branches > > >> to experiment with some new features (and I may do so at some point), > > but > > >> we should limit unnecessary changes to master, and use our code > > >> review/discussion bandwidth as much as possible for working on a > > release) > > >> > > >> I personally even think we could try to release just the platform > (e.g. > > >> NetBeans Platform 9.0 beta) once the platform modules are reviewed. > That > > >> would help us validate whether the approach we are taking makes sense > > (and > > >> what needs to be improved) and would help us learn about the release > > >> process (and the platform is a useful thing on its own, so releasing > it > > >> wouldn't be just an artificial move). > > >> > > >> Jan > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Michael Nascimento < > [email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Definitely we should focus on getting an Apache NetBeans release. > > >>> Sincerely, at this point, I think we should maybe have a Apache > > NetBeans > > >>> 9.0 Java edition, so we can have something release and then a full > > Apache > > >>> NB 9.0. Otherwise, sounds like we'll get no release this year, which > > >> would > > >>> be pretty sad. > > >>> > > >>> Regards, > > >>> Michael > > >>> > > >>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&; > > >>> utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> > > >>> Virus-free. > > >>> www.avg.com > > >>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&; > > >>> utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> > > >>> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 4:17 AM, Geertjan Wielenga < > > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Hi all, > > >>>> > > >>>> We need to discuss something, I think -- do we begin accepting pull > > >>>> requests, and thereby encourage pull requests to be created -- or do > > we > > >>>> focus very narrowly on preparing Apache NetBeans for its first > > >> incubator > > >>>> release? > > >>>> > > >>>> If we were to focus narrowly on preparing the Apache release, then > > this > > >>> is > > >>>> what we would focus on, nothing else: > > >>>> > > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/ > > >>>> List+of+Modules+to+Review > > >>>> > > >>>> At the same time, of course, people want to add their mark to Apache > > >>>> NetBeans. And that means code or an icon, a menu item, a new UI > thing > > >> to > > >>>> point at and say -- see, I did that! These kinds of enhancements > could > > >> be > > >>>> done at the same time as the above, and would require that some > people > > >>>> split their time between doing the module reviews and reviewing pull > > >>>> requests. > > >>>> > > >>>> I'm not stating a preference here, just putting the discussion out > > >> there, > > >>>> since I've seen conflicting opinions about this and I think it would > > be > > >>>> good to discuss this centrally. > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks, > > >>>> > > >>>> Gj > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > Craig L Russell > > Secretary, Apache Software Foundation > > [email protected] http://db.apache.org/jdo > > > > >
