Agree as well and really cool to see much activity and interaction. Gj
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Sven Reimers <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I fully agree with Jan.. > > Let's try to get something released first so we know the process.. > > Hope to have some time to review modules real soon now.. > > -Sven > > Am 26.09.2017 22:13 schrieb "Jan Lahoda" <[email protected]>: > > > +1 (I think that if we want to get some rest and fun, we could use > branches > > to experiment with some new features (and I may do so at some point), but > > we should limit unnecessary changes to master, and use our code > > review/discussion bandwidth as much as possible for working on a release) > > > > I personally even think we could try to release just the platform (e.g. > > NetBeans Platform 9.0 beta) once the platform modules are reviewed. That > > would help us validate whether the approach we are taking makes sense > (and > > what needs to be improved) and would help us learn about the release > > process (and the platform is a useful thing on its own, so releasing it > > wouldn't be just an artificial move). > > > > Jan > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Michael Nascimento <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Definitely we should focus on getting an Apache NetBeans release. > > > Sincerely, at this point, I think we should maybe have a Apache > NetBeans > > > 9.0 Java edition, so we can have something release and then a full > Apache > > > NB 9.0. Otherwise, sounds like we'll get no release this year, which > > would > > > be pretty sad. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Michael > > > > > > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&; > > > utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> > > > Virus-free. > > > www.avg.com > > > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&; > > > utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 4:17 AM, Geertjan Wielenga < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > We need to discuss something, I think -- do we begin accepting pull > > > > requests, and thereby encourage pull requests to be created -- or do > we > > > > focus very narrowly on preparing Apache NetBeans for its first > > incubator > > > > release? > > > > > > > > If we were to focus narrowly on preparing the Apache release, then > this > > > is > > > > what we would focus on, nothing else: > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/ > > > > List+of+Modules+to+Review > > > > > > > > At the same time, of course, people want to add their mark to Apache > > > > NetBeans. And that means code or an icon, a menu item, a new UI thing > > to > > > > point at and say -- see, I did that! These kinds of enhancements > could > > be > > > > done at the same time as the above, and would require that some > people > > > > split their time between doing the module reviews and reviewing pull > > > > requests. > > > > > > > > I'm not stating a preference here, just putting the discussion out > > there, > > > > since I've seen conflicting opinions about this and I think it would > be > > > > good to discuss this centrally. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Gj > > > > > > > > > >
