http://log.ofbiz.org should have the previous days demo logs all zipped up in case there are multiple files. Please keep checking it out as it's still in BETA :)
Cheers, Tim -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 ----- "Tim Ruppert" <[email protected]> wrote: > I've got everything in place to have log files available to the > community. Will be trying to release it officially tomorrow. > > Cheers, > Tim > -- > Tim Ruppert > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > o:801.649.6594 > f:801.649.6595 > > ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Ashish, > > > > I'm more looking for errors generated after build, by users online. > > But yes, these ones colud be interesting too... > > > > Jacques > > > > From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[email protected]> > > > Hello, > > > > > > Please take a look on the following link. > > > http://ant.apache.org/faq.html#mail-logger > > > > > > To me details can be of some help for us. > > > > > > -- > > > Ashish Vijaywargiya > > > > > > > > > Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > >> I agree with Tim the full log seems more usefull. > > >> Tim suggested to use a log analysis tool. From Contegix > experience > > > > >> Apache Chainsaw does not seem to be a good candidate. > > >> There are also MindTree Insight > > >> http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=805978 > > >> and Vigilog http://vigilog.sourceforge.net/ but I'm not sure we > > need a > > >> such tools for now... > > >> > > >> Jacques > > >> > > >> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[email protected]> > > >>> I actually like the idea of having the entire logs for the day > > >>> available the day after. We could easily do it just like we do > > >>> build.ofbiz.org for the daily builds - having something like > > >>> logs.ofbiz.org with a similar style and having them available > for > > >>> viewing. We could even have individual errors available via the > > > >>> route that you were talking about David - by having OFBiz send > > >>> them to a place where we can pluck them off. > > >>> > > >>> Something like this could be really helpful. Anyways, let's > keep > > > > >>> chatting on it - but the full days logs being available the > next > > >>> day makes good sense to me. > > >>> > > >>> Cheers, > > >>> Tim > > >>> -- > > >>> Tim Ruppert > > >>> HotWax Media > > >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > >>> > > >>> o:801.649.6594 > > >>> f:801.649.6595 > > >>> > > >>> ----- "Tim Ruppert" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Could we create another mailing list for these types of things > > that > > >>>> people - and hopefully all committers :) - would subscribe to? > > >>>> Something like [email protected]? I imagine that the > > errors > > >>>> will be less than helpful without the steps that caused it - > but > > it > > >>>> could be a start? I'm not opposed to just making the previous > > days > > >>>> log file available to people who want to scan it as well. > > >>>> > > >>>> I've also got a thread going with Contegix about this very > thing > > at > > >>>> the moment talking about other helpful ways of looking at logs > - > > will > > >>>> loop you in David. > > >>>> > > >>>> Cheers, > > >>>> Tim > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Tim Ruppert > > >>>> HotWax Media > > >>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > >>>> > > >>>> o:801.649.6594 > > >>>> f:801.649.6595 > > >>>> > > >>>> ----- "David E Jones" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> > The easiest thing to do is have Log4J send the emails with a > > little > > >>>> > > >>>> > setting in the log4j.xml file. We could do this for all > ERROR > > and > > >>>> > FATAL level messages. > > >>>> > > > >>>> > Where to send them is another issue. I suppose if we really > > wanted > > >>>> > > >>>> > people to get on these then having them go to the dev list > > would do > > >>>> > > >>>> > the trick... but we may get a lot of email from this... even > > >>>> hundreds > > >>>> > > > >>>> > a day. > > >>>> > > > >>>> > -David > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > On Apr 5, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > This is a good idea. I don't know the technologies all > that > > well > > >>>> > > >>>> > > for scanning logs, but we can have this put in place and > > have > > >>>> > > automated messages sent each day. Does anyone know how > we'd > > go > > >>>> > > about doing this? If no one else has any great ideas on > the > > way, > > >>>> > > >>>> > > I'm sure that Jacques and I, along with Contegix, can try > and > > put > > >>>> > > >>>> > > something rudimentary in place. > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > Cheers, > > >>>> > > Tim > > >>>> > > -- > > >>>> > > Tim Ruppert > > >>>> > > HotWax Media > > >>>> > > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > o:801.649.6594 > > >>>> > > f:801.649.6595 > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > >> It's not a deterministic way, but I think we should > exploit > > >>>> > error.log > > >>>> > >> on demo server to fix error instead waiting people to > > report > > >>>> them. > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> Jacques > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >
