Hello, Please take a look on the following link. http://ant.apache.org/faq.html#mail-logger
To me details can be of some help for us. -- Ashish Vijaywargiya Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I agree with Tim the full log seems more usefull.Tim suggested to use a log analysis tool. From Contegix experience Apache Chainsaw does not seem to be a good candidate. There are also MindTree Insight http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=805978 and Vigilog http://vigilog.sourceforge.net/ but I'm not sure we need a such tools for now...Jacques From: "Tim Ruppert" <[email protected]>I actually like the idea of having the entire logs for the day available the day after. We could easily do it just like we do build.ofbiz.org for the daily builds - having something like logs.ofbiz.org with a similar style and having them available for viewing. We could even have individual errors available via the route that you were talking about David - by having OFBiz sendthem to a place where we can pluck them off.Something like this could be really helpful. Anyways, let's keep chatting on it - but the full days logs being available the nextday makes good sense to me. Cheers, Tim -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 ----- "Tim Ruppert" <[email protected]> wrote:Could we create another mailing list for these types of things that people - and hopefully all committers :) - would subscribe to? Something like [email protected]? I imagine that the errors will be less than helpful without the steps that caused it - but it could be a start? I'm not opposed to just making the previous days log file available to people who want to scan it as well. I've also got a thread going with Contegix about this very thing at the moment talking about other helpful ways of looking at logs - will loop you in David. Cheers, Tim -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 ----- "David E Jones" <[email protected]> wrote: > The easiest thing to do is have Log4J send the emails with a little > setting in the log4j.xml file. We could do this for all ERROR and > FATAL level messages. > > Where to send them is another issue. I suppose if we really wanted > people to get on these then having them go to the dev list would do > the trick... but we may get a lot of email from this... even hundreds > > a day. > > -David > > > On Apr 5, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: > > > This is a good idea. I don't know the technologies all that well > > for scanning logs, but we can have this put in place and have > > automated messages sent each day. Does anyone know how we'd go > > about doing this? If no one else has any great ideas on the way, > > I'm sure that Jacques and I, along with Contegix, can try and put > > something rudimentary in place. > > > > Cheers, > > Tim > > -- > > Tim Ruppert > > HotWax Media > > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > > > o:801.649.6594 > > f:801.649.6595 > > > > ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> It's not a deterministic way, but I think we should exploit > error.log > >> on demo server to fix error instead waiting people to report them. > >> > >> Jacques
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
