-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 thanks.
Tim Ruppert sent the following on 4/8/2009 9:33 AM: > http://log.ofbiz.org should have the previous days demo logs all zipped up in > case there are multiple files. Please keep checking it out as it's still in > BETA :) > > Cheers, > Tim > -- > Tim Ruppert > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > o:801.649.6594 > f:801.649.6595 > > ----- "Tim Ruppert" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I've got everything in place to have log files available to the >> community. Will be trying to release it officially tomorrow. >> >> Cheers, >> Tim >> -- >> Tim Ruppert >> HotWax Media >> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> >> o:801.649.6594 >> f:801.649.6595 >> >> ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Ashish, >>> >>> I'm more looking for errors generated after build, by users online. >>> But yes, these ones colud be interesting too... >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[email protected]> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Please take a look on the following link. >>>> http://ant.apache.org/faq.html#mail-logger >>>> >>>> To me details can be of some help for us. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ashish Vijaywargiya >>>> >>>> >>>> Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>> I agree with Tim the full log seems more usefull. >>>>> Tim suggested to use a log analysis tool. From Contegix >> experience >>>>> Apache Chainsaw does not seem to be a good candidate. >>>>> There are also MindTree Insight >>>>> http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=805978 >>>>> and Vigilog http://vigilog.sourceforge.net/ but I'm not sure we >>> need a >>>>> such tools for now... >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[email protected]> >>>>>> I actually like the idea of having the entire logs for the day >>>>>> available the day after. We could easily do it just like we do >>>>>> build.ofbiz.org for the daily builds - having something like >>>>>> logs.ofbiz.org with a similar style and having them available >> for >>>>>> viewing. We could even have individual errors available via the >>>>>> route that you were talking about David - by having OFBiz send >>>>>> them to a place where we can pluck them off. >>>>>> >>>>>> Something like this could be really helpful. Anyways, let's >> keep >>>>>> chatting on it - but the full days logs being available the >> next >>>>>> day makes good sense to me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Tim >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>> >>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- "Tim Ruppert" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Could we create another mailing list for these types of things >>> that >>>>>>> people - and hopefully all committers :) - would subscribe to? >>>>>>> Something like [email protected]? I imagine that the >>> errors >>>>>>> will be less than helpful without the steps that caused it - >> but >>> it >>>>>>> could be a start? I'm not opposed to just making the previous >>> days >>>>>>> log file available to people who want to scan it as well. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've also got a thread going with Contegix about this very >> thing >>> at >>>>>>> the moment talking about other helpful ways of looking at logs >> - >>> will >>>>>>> loop you in David. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ----- "David E Jones" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The easiest thing to do is have Log4J send the emails with a >>> little >>>>>>>> setting in the log4j.xml file. We could do this for all >> ERROR >>> and >>>>>>>> FATAL level messages. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Where to send them is another issue. I suppose if we really >>> wanted >>>>>>>> people to get on these then having them go to the dev list >>> would do >>>>>>>> the trick... but we may get a lot of email from this... even >>>>>>> hundreds >>>>>>>> a day. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -David >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Apr 5, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This is a good idea. I don't know the technologies all >> that >>> well >>>>>>>>> for scanning logs, but we can have this put in place and >>> have >>>>>>>>> automated messages sent each day. Does anyone know how >> we'd >>> go >>>>>>>>> about doing this? If no one else has any great ideas on >> the >>> way, >>>>>>>>> I'm sure that Jacques and I, along with Contegix, can try >> and >>> put >>>>>>>>> something rudimentary in place. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> It's not a deterministic way, but I think we should >> exploit >>>>>>>> error.log >>>>>>>>>> on demo server to fix error instead waiting people to >>> report >>>>>>> them. >>>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJ3RL1rP3NbaWWqE4RAhqyAJoDbwrUaEeixN4M9paTELwDvFyuMwCeMrmW oSx/js8ui2+GTo9wre75TUo= =7QFK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
