I've got everything in place to have log files available to the community. Will be trying to release it officially tomorrow.
Cheers, Tim -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ashish, > > I'm more looking for errors generated after build, by users online. > But yes, these ones colud be interesting too... > > Jacques > > From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[email protected]> > > Hello, > > > > Please take a look on the following link. > > http://ant.apache.org/faq.html#mail-logger > > > > To me details can be of some help for us. > > > > -- > > Ashish Vijaywargiya > > > > > > Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> I agree with Tim the full log seems more usefull. > >> Tim suggested to use a log analysis tool. From Contegix experience > > >> Apache Chainsaw does not seem to be a good candidate. > >> There are also MindTree Insight > >> http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=805978 > >> and Vigilog http://vigilog.sourceforge.net/ but I'm not sure we > need a > >> such tools for now... > >> > >> Jacques > >> > >> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[email protected]> > >>> I actually like the idea of having the entire logs for the day > >>> available the day after. We could easily do it just like we do > >>> build.ofbiz.org for the daily builds - having something like > >>> logs.ofbiz.org with a similar style and having them available for > >>> viewing. We could even have individual errors available via the > >>> route that you were talking about David - by having OFBiz send > >>> them to a place where we can pluck them off. > >>> > >>> Something like this could be really helpful. Anyways, let's keep > > >>> chatting on it - but the full days logs being available the next > >>> day makes good sense to me. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Tim > >>> -- > >>> Tim Ruppert > >>> HotWax Media > >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >>> > >>> o:801.649.6594 > >>> f:801.649.6595 > >>> > >>> ----- "Tim Ruppert" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Could we create another mailing list for these types of things > that > >>>> people - and hopefully all committers :) - would subscribe to? > >>>> Something like [email protected]? I imagine that the > errors > >>>> will be less than helpful without the steps that caused it - but > it > >>>> could be a start? I'm not opposed to just making the previous > days > >>>> log file available to people who want to scan it as well. > >>>> > >>>> I've also got a thread going with Contegix about this very thing > at > >>>> the moment talking about other helpful ways of looking at logs - > will > >>>> loop you in David. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Tim > >>>> -- > >>>> Tim Ruppert > >>>> HotWax Media > >>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >>>> > >>>> o:801.649.6594 > >>>> f:801.649.6595 > >>>> > >>>> ----- "David E Jones" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > The easiest thing to do is have Log4J send the emails with a > little > >>>> > >>>> > setting in the log4j.xml file. We could do this for all ERROR > and > >>>> > FATAL level messages. > >>>> > > >>>> > Where to send them is another issue. I suppose if we really > wanted > >>>> > >>>> > people to get on these then having them go to the dev list > would do > >>>> > >>>> > the trick... but we may get a lot of email from this... even > >>>> hundreds > >>>> > > >>>> > a day. > >>>> > > >>>> > -David > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > On Apr 5, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: > >>>> > > >>>> > > This is a good idea. I don't know the technologies all that > well > >>>> > >>>> > > for scanning logs, but we can have this put in place and > have > >>>> > > automated messages sent each day. Does anyone know how we'd > go > >>>> > > about doing this? If no one else has any great ideas on the > way, > >>>> > >>>> > > I'm sure that Jacques and I, along with Contegix, can try and > put > >>>> > >>>> > > something rudimentary in place. > >>>> > > > >>>> > > Cheers, > >>>> > > Tim > >>>> > > -- > >>>> > > Tim Ruppert > >>>> > > HotWax Media > >>>> > > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >>>> > > > >>>> > > o:801.649.6594 > >>>> > > f:801.649.6595 > >>>> > > > >>>> > > ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> > > > >>>> > >> It's not a deterministic way, but I think we should exploit > >>>> > error.log > >>>> > >> on demo server to fix error instead waiting people to > report > >>>> them. > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> Jacques > >>> > >> > >> > >
