I actually like the idea of having the entire logs for the day available the 
day after.  We could easily do it just like we do build.ofbiz.org for the daily 
builds - having something like logs.ofbiz.org with a similar style and having 
them available for viewing.  We could even have individual errors available via 
the route that you were talking about David - by having OFBiz send them to a 
place where we can pluck them off.

Something like this could be really helpful.  Anyways, let's keep chatting on 
it - but the full days logs being available the next day makes good sense to me.

Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595

----- "Tim Ruppert" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Could we create another mailing list for these types of things that
> people - and hopefully all committers :) - would subscribe to? 
> Something like [email protected]?  I imagine that the errors
> will be less than helpful without the steps that caused it - but it
> could be a start?  I'm not opposed to just making the previous days
> log file available to people who want to scan it as well.
> 
> I've also got a thread going with Contegix about this very thing at
> the moment talking about other helpful ways of looking at logs - will
> loop you in David.
> 
> Cheers,
> Tim
> --
> Tim Ruppert
> HotWax Media
> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
> 
> o:801.649.6594
> f:801.649.6595
> 
> ----- "David E Jones" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > The easiest thing to do is have Log4J send the emails with a little 
> 
> > setting in the log4j.xml file. We could do this for all ERROR and  
> > FATAL level messages.
> > 
> > Where to send them is another issue. I suppose if we really wanted 
> 
> > people to get on these then having them go to the dev list would do 
> 
> > the trick... but we may get a lot of email from this... even
> hundreds 
> > 
> > a day.
> > 
> > -David
> > 
> > 
> > On Apr 5, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
> > 
> > > This is a good idea.  I don't know the technologies all that well 
> 
> > > for scanning logs, but we can have this put in place and have  
> > > automated messages sent each day.  Does anyone know how we'd go  
> > > about doing this?  If no one else has any great ideas on the way, 
> 
> > > I'm sure that Jacques and I, along with Contegix, can try and put 
> 
> > > something rudimentary in place.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Tim
> > > --
> > > Tim Ruppert
> > > HotWax Media
> > > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
> > >
> > > o:801.649.6594
> > > f:801.649.6595
> > >
> > > ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> It's not a deterministic way, but I think we should exploit
> > error.log
> > >> on demo server to fix error instead waiting people to report
> them.
> > >>
> > >> Jacques

Reply via email to