Jacques, all, I did a series of changes (rev. 1180638) to the text and formatting of the "Download" page and now it should be easier to understand what to download and how things are structured; I have tried to incorporate your feedback. When you can, please have a look (and a double look to typos and grammar).
Kind regards, Jacopo On Oct 8, 2011, at 5:13 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Thanks Jacopo, > > I had the feeling I was missing something. I plenty agree with your > suggestions. Could we not had a word on this page about "live" > branches (vs freezed/zipped releases) and a link to repo (vs downloads > mirrors)? I'm currently in vacation for a week, so I will not > work on this soon... > > Jacques > > From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[email protected]> >> Thank you Jacques, please see my note below: >> >> On Oct 5, 2011, at 3:55 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >>> Maybe we should make more clear somewhere that releases like 10.04.01 or >>> 09.04.02 are only tagged revisions in respective >>> branches >>> (or did I miss some places where this is clearly explained?). In other >>> words only branches are still evolving when releases are >>> freezed. >> >> This is explainedin the official download page (where releases are >> published): >> >> http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html >> >> but of course we could improve the information there; I was thinking to >> better separate the latest release 10.04 from the older >> ones and also, inside a series, decrease the fonts of the older releases. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Jacopo
