Maybe, as a consensus, we can put a word about it and not a link?
Jacques
From: "Hans Bakker" <mailingl...@antwebsystems.com>
But Apache does not prohibit it?
you want to be the best pupil in the Apache school?
I still think this is wrong not to mention it.
Hans
On 04/07/2012 11:38 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Thank you Hans,
the download page is intended to end users and we can't include there links to download code that has not been officially
approved; this was an issue we had in the past and the ASF asked us to fix the page in the past.
For the trunk all the information is here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBADMIN/ofbiz-source-repository-and-access.html
(but that page will have to be converted to html and become "more official").
Jacopo
On Apr 7, 2012, at 6:33 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
This looks pretty good Jacopo,
congratulations.
However no mention of the latest trunk? That should be at least mentioned.
Regards,
Hans
On 04/07/2012 11:27 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
I have now updated the OFBiz download page with a new section containing the
tentative release schedule for each release:
http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html
Congratulations, we have now a plan (simple but effective and achievable) and at least users now have a clear vision of the
lifespan of the release branch they are using and can plan in advance the migration of their custom instance.
Jacopo
On Feb 27, 2012, at 12:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Jacopo Cappellato"<jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com>
On Feb 26, 2012, at 8:04 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
For me also 6 months seems long enough for the 1st official release. I'm just afraid: will we have not a lot of work to
release so often (relases themself, annunciations, site update and especially demos updates)
Anyway it seems we need to do it, maybe at the expense of other areas we are
working on (Jiras, users support, etc.)
It will take time for sure but working on releases should be the main goal of a community within the ASF: a release is the
only trusted way to publish the work we do: if we fix a bug but we do not issue a release the users will not get real
benefit.
Sounds logical and good to me. It's time to go ahead regarding our way of doing releases. Some time ago, due to our change of
way (less using trunk), I was afraid that committers activity would be lower, but it seems to be steady up... so far...
Jacques
Jacopo
Jacques
