Actually I don't care much. It was mostly to find a consens.... er... compromise. So I let Hans handles that if he wants (no commits
war please)...
For those who are relatively new to this ML, we should though explain that
recommnending to use trunk to users has been the
inclination of OFBiz original creators. At this time it was vital for the
project to get more contributions and I must say it's also
easier for committers to contribute directly (this is actually not a big deal,
a patch is an easy way most of the time). See for
instance http://markmail.org/message/ee2mzldkkzg6im5x, the link there is now
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Apache+OFBiz+Getting+Started
(BTW this needs certainly an update, but actually
all the documentation needs update and pruning).
Jacopo was the 1st to propose another way:
http://markmail.org/message/vh7jrgmwfmxrd4bh
And to clarify my position: I'm supporting releases for a long time now (I mean
backporting bugs, sometimes at my expense ;o).
Fortunately it turns that it's easier and safer since the R10.04 release. I
believe that this new way of doing allows 2 pathes
(trunk or releases) and we need both!
Hope this summarises well my POV and the situation
Jacques
From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com>
I am against this, especially if it comes as an order issued by Hans: he is not
in the position of being aggressive or forcing us
to do what it pleases him, he doesn't have the skills, the power, the merit to
rule us (not to mention me); he did it in the past
just because we let him do this.
Now, if you and Hans feel that we should add a sentence about the trunk in the
download page, please provide a valid motivation
and a valid text, then start a vote: if the community will vote in favor of it
I will be happy to accept and implement
accordingly; otherwise I will not waste more of my time discussing this just to
please Hans.
Jacopo
On Apr 7, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com>
This is not consensus, it is a compromise.
Right
What is the purpose of mentioning that we have also a trunk (obvious)
To relax each other positions (is that even English? :o).
Meant for users for are not acquainted with open source but still potential
OFBiz users
and what is the text that you would like to add there?
<<Beside the releases you could also go the bleeding edge way
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleeding_edge_technology] and check
out the trunk from OFBiz repository (Subversion)>>
Depending of the way we prefer to present it, could be also state of art
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_the_art] because
trunk is really not that bleeding edge...
Jacques
Jacopo
On Apr 7, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Maybe, as a consensus, we can put a word about it and not a link?
Jacques
From: "Hans Bakker" <mailingl...@antwebsystems.com>
But Apache does not prohibit it?
you want to be the best pupil in the Apache school?
I still think this is wrong not to mention it.
Hans
On 04/07/2012 11:38 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Thank you Hans,
the download page is intended to end users and we can't include there links to
download code that has not been officially
approved; this was an issue we had in the past and the ASF asked us to fix the
page in the past.
For the trunk all the information is here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBADMIN/ofbiz-source-repository-and-access.html
(but that page will have to be converted to html and become "more official").
Jacopo
On Apr 7, 2012, at 6:33 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
This looks pretty good Jacopo,
congratulations.
However no mention of the latest trunk? That should be at least mentioned.
Regards,
Hans
On 04/07/2012 11:27 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
I have now updated the OFBiz download page with a new section containing the
tentative release schedule for each release:
http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html
Congratulations, we have now a plan (simple but effective and achievable) and
at least users now have a clear vision of the
lifespan of the release branch they are using and can plan in advance the
migration of their custom instance.
Jacopo
On Feb 27, 2012, at 12:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Jacopo Cappellato"<jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com>
On Feb 26, 2012, at 8:04 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
For me also 6 months seems long enough for the 1st official release. I'm just
afraid: will we have not a lot of work to
release so often (relases themself, annunciations, site update and especially
demos updates)
Anyway it seems we need to do it, maybe at the expense of other areas we are
working on (Jiras, users support, etc.)
It will take time for sure but working on releases should be the main goal of a
community within the ASF: a release is
the only trusted way to publish the work we do: if we fix a bug but we do not
issue a release the users will not get real
benefit.
Sounds logical and good to me. It's time to go ahead regarding our way of doing
releases. Some time ago, due to our change
of way (less using trunk), I was afraid that committers activity would be
lower, but it seems to be steady up... so far...
Jacques
Jacopo
Jacques
