This is not consensus, it is a compromise. What is the purpose of mentioning that we have also a trunk (obvious) and what is the text that you would like to add there?
Jacopo On Apr 7, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Maybe, as a consensus, we can put a word about it and not a link? > > Jacques > > From: "Hans Bakker" <mailingl...@antwebsystems.com> >> But Apache does not prohibit it? >> >> you want to be the best pupil in the Apache school? >> >> I still think this is wrong not to mention it. >> >> Hans >> >> On 04/07/2012 11:38 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >>> Thank you Hans, >>> >>> the download page is intended to end users and we can't include there links >>> to download code that has not been officially approved; this was an issue >>> we had in the past and the ASF asked us to fix the page in the past. >>> For the trunk all the information is here: >>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBADMIN/ofbiz-source-repository-and-access.html >>> >>> (but that page will have to be converted to html and become "more >>> official"). >>> >>> Jacopo >>> >>> On Apr 7, 2012, at 6:33 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: >>> >>>> This looks pretty good Jacopo, >>>> >>>> congratulations. >>>> >>>> However no mention of the latest trunk? That should be at least mentioned. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Hans >>>> >>>> On 04/07/2012 11:27 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >>>>> I have now updated the OFBiz download page with a new section containing >>>>> the tentative release schedule for each release: >>>>> >>>>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html >>>>> >>>>> Congratulations, we have now a plan (simple but effective and achievable) >>>>> and at least users now have a clear vision of the lifespan of the release >>>>> branch they are using and can plan in advance the migration of their >>>>> custom instance. >>>>> >>>>> Jacopo >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 27, 2012, at 12:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato"<jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> >>>>>>> On Feb 26, 2012, at 8:04 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For me also 6 months seems long enough for the 1st official release. >>>>>>>> I'm just afraid: will we have not a lot of work to release so often >>>>>>>> (relases themself, annunciations, site update and especially demos >>>>>>>> updates) >>>>>>>> Anyway it seems we need to do it, maybe at the expense of other areas >>>>>>>> we are working on (Jiras, users support, etc.) >>>>>>> It will take time for sure but working on releases should be the main >>>>>>> goal of a community within the ASF: a release is the only trusted way >>>>>>> to publish the work we do: if we fix a bug but we do not issue a >>>>>>> release the users will not get real benefit. >>>>>> Sounds logical and good to me. It's time to go ahead regarding our way >>>>>> of doing releases. Some time ago, due to our change of way (less using >>>>>> trunk), I was afraid that committers activity would be lower, but it >>>>>> seems to be steady up... so far... >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacopo >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jacques
