I didn't see the email saying the need from chica to put patches to
logic. Sorry, my bad :)

Are those patches specific to chica only? Maybe we can benefit from
those patches instead of having a chica custom build?

-Win

On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 15:03 -0400, Burke Mamlin wrote:
> Win,
> 
> 
> You cannot commit to a tag, so cannot back port maintenance releases.
>  A 0.5.x branch would allow for back porting of patches from trunk and
> tagging of 0.5.1, 0.5.2, etc.
> 
> 
> -Burke
> 
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Nyoman Ribeka <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>         We have a tag for logic 0.5 on our repository.
>         
>         http://svn.openmrs.org/openmrs-modules/logic/tags/0.5/
>         
>         -Win
>         
>         
>         On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 10:39 -0700, Darius Jazayeri wrote:
>         > The logic module included in OpenMRS versions is always a
>         bundled,
>         > released version of logic.
>         >
>         >
>         > So 1.6.3+, 1.7.2+, and 1.8+ contain the 0.5 tag of logic.
>         (The point
>         > is that the end-user may upgrade to a newer version of the
>         logic
>         > module, but not an older one.)
>         >
>         >
>         > -Darius
>         >
>         > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:06 AM, McKee, Steven Jay
>         > <[email protected]> wrote:
>         >         So are the OpenMRS versions specified below built
>         containing
>         >         the 0.5 tag of logic or the trunk of logic as a
>         bundled
>         >         module?
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >         I’m fine with using ant/maven builds concurrently,
>         but I just
>         >         prefer to see consistency when it comes to builds
>         instead of
>         >         moving targets.  I like how the branches are setup
>         for
>         >         OpenMRS, and I just think logic could benefit from
>         the same
>         >         process.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >         Thanks,
>         >
>         >         Steve
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >         From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
>         Behalf Of
>         >         Darius Jazayeri
>         >         Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 12:23 PM
>         >         To: [email protected]
>         >         Subject: Re: [OPENMRS-DEV] Logic Module Changes
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >         Logic 0.5 is the version of logic for 1.6.3, 1.7.1,
>         1.8, and
>         >         trunk (or something approximately like that). I.e.
>         it's used
>         >         with both maven-based and ant-based core OpenMRS
>         versions.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >         Is there actually any downside to having logic built
>         via
>         >         maven, and the rest of your code built via ant?
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >         -Darius
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >         On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 8:57 AM, McKee, Steven Jay
>         >         <[email protected]> wrote:
>         >
>         >         I just noticed the logic module has recently
>         undergone some
>         >         Maven updates.  Is it possible to get a 0.5 branch
>         created
>         >         before they were made?  The Maven changes could
>         eventually
>         >         become a 0.6 version of logic.  We’re currently
>         upgrading our
>         >         software to use OpenMRS 1.7.x, and we want to keep
>         the same
>         >         build standard for the logic module as well since
>         1.7.x states
>         >         it uses 0.5 of logic.  Thoughts?
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >         Thanks,
>         >
>         >         Steve
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         ______________________________________________________________
>         >         Click here to unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers'
>         mailing
>         >         list
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         ______________________________________________________________
>         >         Click here to unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers'
>         mailing
>         >         list
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         ______________________________________________________________
>         >         Click here to unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers'
>         mailing
>         >         list
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         ______________________________________________________________________
>         > Click here to unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing
>         list
>         
>         
>         _________________________________________
>         
>         To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an
>         e-mail to [email protected] with "SIGNOFF
>         openmrs-devel-l" in the  body (not the subject) of your
>         e-mail.
>         
>         [mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%
>         20openmrs-devel-l]
>         
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Click here to unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list

_________________________________________

To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to 
[email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the  body (not 
the subject) of your e-mail.

[mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l]

Reply via email to