Done, and assigned.

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Saptarshi Purkayastha <[email protected]>wrote:

> Created a ticket here: https://tickets.openmrs.org/browse/LOGIC-90
> ... someone needs to asses it, before I can claim it!
>
>  ---
> Regards,
> Saptarshi PURKAYASTHA
>
> My Tech Blog:  http://sunnytalkstech.blogspot.com
> You Live by CHOICE, Not by CHANCE
>
>
> On 26 August 2011 02:54, Darius Jazayeri <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Patches welcome. :-)
>>
>> Logic needs to run on 1.6.x, so we can't use liquibase.
>>
>> It's fine to change the existing SQL scripts in-place, since there's no
>> checksum, like in liquibase.
>>
>> -Dar
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Saptarshi Purkayastha 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> ... and after the branching happens, can someone change the SQL scripts
>>> that are inside the sqldiff.xml to be ANSI SQL compatible in the trunk.
>>> Or atleast use liquibase like xmls ??
>>>
>>> Since Logic is a core module without which OpenMRS won't start... I've
>>> had a hard time to make OpenMRS run on all database servers.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Regards,
>>> Saptarshi PURKAYASTHA
>>>
>>> My Tech Blog:  http://sunnytalkstech.blogspot.com
>>> You Live by CHOICE, Not by CHANCE
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26 August 2011 01:47, Darius Jazayeri <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> For what it's worth, no actual development has happened on logic since
>>>> February, which is basically when logic 0.5 was released. My intent at the
>>>> time was to not create the 0.5.x branch until we actually had development
>>>> work happening on a new feature.
>>>>
>>>> Though since logic was mavenized, I think it's definitely right to make
>>>> a pre-maven 0.5.x branch. Win, what revision did you branch the 0.5.x 
>>>> branch
>>>> from? I believe there are some commits after the 0.5 tag that should be
>>>> backported to the 0.5 branch.
>>>>
>>>> Alternately, if nobody has started using the 0.5.x branch yet, could we
>>>> delete that and branch it right after rev:18407 (the last pre-maven commit,
>>>> in February, by Tammy)?
>>>>
>>>> -Darius
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Nyoman Ribeka <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> 0.5.x branch created.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Win
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 14:16 -0400, Tammy Dugan wrote:
>>>>> > Thanks, Burke.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Tammy
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On 8/24/2011 1:58 PM, Burke Mamlin wrote:
>>>>> > > Trunk has followed the pattern of creating a "major.minor.x" branch
>>>>> > > and tagging from there, allowing for select bug fixes from trunk to
>>>>> > > be backported to that branch and, as needed, new maintenance
>>>>> > > releases to be tagged off that branch.  That approach has worked
>>>>> > > pretty well for trunk.  It's overkill for small or less-used
>>>>> > > modules, but logic probably warrants following it.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > -Burke
>>>>> > >
>>>>>
>>>>> _________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to
>>>>> [email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the
>>>>>  body (not the subject) of your e-mail.
>>>>>
>>>>> [mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l]
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Click here to 
>>> unsubscribe<[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l>from 
>>> OpenMRS Developers' mailing list
>>
>>
>>
> ------------------------------
> Click here to 
> unsubscribe<[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l>from 
> OpenMRS Developers' mailing list
>

_________________________________________

To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to 
[email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the  body (not 
the subject) of your e-mail.

[mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l]

Reply via email to