Patches welcome. :-)

Logic needs to run on 1.6.x, so we can't use liquibase.

It's fine to change the existing SQL scripts in-place, since there's no
checksum, like in liquibase.

-Dar

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Saptarshi Purkayastha <[email protected]>wrote:

> ... and after the branching happens, can someone change the SQL scripts
> that are inside the sqldiff.xml to be ANSI SQL compatible in the trunk.
> Or atleast use liquibase like xmls ??
>
> Since Logic is a core module without which OpenMRS won't start... I've had
> a hard time to make OpenMRS run on all database servers.
>
> ---
> Regards,
> Saptarshi PURKAYASTHA
>
> My Tech Blog:  http://sunnytalkstech.blogspot.com
> You Live by CHOICE, Not by CHANCE
>
>
>
> On 26 August 2011 01:47, Darius Jazayeri <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> For what it's worth, no actual development has happened on logic since
>> February, which is basically when logic 0.5 was released. My intent at the
>> time was to not create the 0.5.x branch until we actually had development
>> work happening on a new feature.
>>
>> Though since logic was mavenized, I think it's definitely right to make a
>> pre-maven 0.5.x branch. Win, what revision did you branch the 0.5.x branch
>> from? I believe there are some commits after the 0.5 tag that should be
>> backported to the 0.5 branch.
>>
>> Alternately, if nobody has started using the 0.5.x branch yet, could we
>> delete that and branch it right after rev:18407 (the last pre-maven commit,
>> in February, by Tammy)?
>>
>> -Darius
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Nyoman Ribeka <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> 0.5.x branch created.
>>>
>>> -Win
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 14:16 -0400, Tammy Dugan wrote:
>>> > Thanks, Burke.
>>> >
>>> > Tammy
>>> >
>>> > On 8/24/2011 1:58 PM, Burke Mamlin wrote:
>>> > > Trunk has followed the pattern of creating a "major.minor.x" branch
>>> > > and tagging from there, allowing for select bug fixes from trunk to
>>> > > be backported to that branch and, as needed, new maintenance
>>> > > releases to be tagged off that branch.  That approach has worked
>>> > > pretty well for trunk.  It's overkill for small or less-used
>>> > > modules, but logic probably warrants following it.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > -Burke
>>> > >
>>>
>>> _________________________________________
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to
>>> [email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the  body
>>> (not the subject) of your e-mail.
>>>
>>> [mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l]
>>>
>>
>>
> ------------------------------
> Click here to 
> unsubscribe<[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l>from 
> OpenMRS Developers' mailing list

_________________________________________

To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to 
[email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the  body (not 
the subject) of your e-mail.

[mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l]

Reply via email to