Created a ticket here: https://tickets.openmrs.org/browse/LOGIC-90 ... someone needs to asses it, before I can claim it!
--- Regards, Saptarshi PURKAYASTHA My Tech Blog: http://sunnytalkstech.blogspot.com You Live by CHOICE, Not by CHANCE On 26 August 2011 02:54, Darius Jazayeri <[email protected]> wrote: > Patches welcome. :-) > > Logic needs to run on 1.6.x, so we can't use liquibase. > > It's fine to change the existing SQL scripts in-place, since there's no > checksum, like in liquibase. > > -Dar > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Saptarshi Purkayastha > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> ... and after the branching happens, can someone change the SQL scripts >> that are inside the sqldiff.xml to be ANSI SQL compatible in the trunk. >> Or atleast use liquibase like xmls ?? >> >> Since Logic is a core module without which OpenMRS won't start... I've had >> a hard time to make OpenMRS run on all database servers. >> >> --- >> Regards, >> Saptarshi PURKAYASTHA >> >> My Tech Blog: http://sunnytalkstech.blogspot.com >> You Live by CHOICE, Not by CHANCE >> >> >> >> On 26 August 2011 01:47, Darius Jazayeri <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> For what it's worth, no actual development has happened on logic since >>> February, which is basically when logic 0.5 was released. My intent at the >>> time was to not create the 0.5.x branch until we actually had development >>> work happening on a new feature. >>> >>> Though since logic was mavenized, I think it's definitely right to make a >>> pre-maven 0.5.x branch. Win, what revision did you branch the 0.5.x branch >>> from? I believe there are some commits after the 0.5 tag that should be >>> backported to the 0.5 branch. >>> >>> Alternately, if nobody has started using the 0.5.x branch yet, could we >>> delete that and branch it right after rev:18407 (the last pre-maven commit, >>> in February, by Tammy)? >>> >>> -Darius >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Nyoman Ribeka <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> 0.5.x branch created. >>>> >>>> -Win >>>> >>>> On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 14:16 -0400, Tammy Dugan wrote: >>>> > Thanks, Burke. >>>> > >>>> > Tammy >>>> > >>>> > On 8/24/2011 1:58 PM, Burke Mamlin wrote: >>>> > > Trunk has followed the pattern of creating a "major.minor.x" branch >>>> > > and tagging from there, allowing for select bug fixes from trunk to >>>> > > be backported to that branch and, as needed, new maintenance >>>> > > releases to be tagged off that branch. That approach has worked >>>> > > pretty well for trunk. It's overkill for small or less-used >>>> > > modules, but logic probably warrants following it. >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > -Burke >>>> > > >>>> >>>> _________________________________________ >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to >>>> [email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the body >>>> (not the subject) of your e-mail. >>>> >>>> [mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l] >>>> >>> >>> >> ------------------------------ >> Click here to >> unsubscribe<[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l>from >> OpenMRS Developers' mailing list > > > _________________________________________ To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to [email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the body (not the subject) of your e-mail. [mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l]
