For what it's worth, no actual development has happened on logic since February, which is basically when logic 0.5 was released. My intent at the time was to not create the 0.5.x branch until we actually had development work happening on a new feature.
Though since logic was mavenized, I think it's definitely right to make a pre-maven 0.5.x branch. Win, what revision did you branch the 0.5.x branch from? I believe there are some commits after the 0.5 tag that should be backported to the 0.5 branch. Alternately, if nobody has started using the 0.5.x branch yet, could we delete that and branch it right after rev:18407 (the last pre-maven commit, in February, by Tammy)? -Darius On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Nyoman Ribeka <[email protected]> wrote: > 0.5.x branch created. > > -Win > > On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 14:16 -0400, Tammy Dugan wrote: > > Thanks, Burke. > > > > Tammy > > > > On 8/24/2011 1:58 PM, Burke Mamlin wrote: > > > Trunk has followed the pattern of creating a "major.minor.x" branch > > > and tagging from there, allowing for select bug fixes from trunk to > > > be backported to that branch and, as needed, new maintenance > > > releases to be tagged off that branch. That approach has worked > > > pretty well for trunk. It's overkill for small or less-used > > > modules, but logic probably warrants following it. > > > > > > > > > -Burke > > > > > _________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to > [email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the body > (not the subject) of your e-mail. > > [mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l] > _________________________________________ To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to [email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the body (not the subject) of your e-mail. [mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l]
