Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
"Sustainability concerns due to our use of unsupported applications (from
Apache Infra perspective), including phpBB and MWiki and reliance on a very
small number of system admins." ...
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Website+Strategic+Plan
And let's not forget alternative ways of addressing this concern:
1) Work with Infra to make MWiki be officially supported.
or
2) Form our own admin group
Indeed, I see no reasons to revisit, especially at the current stage,
the MWiki vs [any other wiki] issue.
MWiki is the biggest source of information about the project; while its
content is often outdated, it's still very useful. Existing links to the
MWiki pages are in the thousands (or more). It has been updated with a
huge effort lead by Jan, and it is now stable and reliable.
If our problem is to enlarge the administrators group for MWiki or to
get it officially supported, I prefer to explore these options first. We
already have three committers who can administer MWiki on the system
administration (shell access) side, right? (jani, imacat, rbircher). How
many more do we need? I've also just asked Infra for clarifications
about the "supported applications" issue.
Regards,
Andrea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
