And here's another: <http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/09/openoffice-after-years-of-neglect-could-shut-down/>.
This one is also rather straightforward, using this list for its sources. I looked through the comments. There is nothing that we haven't seen before. > -----Original Message----- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] > Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 08:05 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long) > > Also, <http://lwn.net/Articles/699047/>. > > The article itself is very straightforward. The comments wander around > all over the place with the usual pontifications about corporate > influence, etc. > > An important point is made, by the way, over how it is that LibreOffice > deployment is far easier than that for AOO, and also much improved. > > - Dennios > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: RA Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de] > > Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 04:01 > > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? > (long) > > > > Hello, > > > > our discussion became public: > > > > http://www.linux-magazin.de/content/view/full/106599 > > > > This shows a public interest. So "going public" seems not to > difficult. > > > > Kind regards > > Michael > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
