Am 10/21/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Pedro:
On 20/10/2016 19:05, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/20/2016 02:48 AM, schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
Also what happened to 4.2.0-dev in the "Latest confirmation in:" field?
do we want to have dev-builds in this field? These builds are changing
day for day when using the install files from the build bots.
So if someone does use a master build (currently 4.2.0) and finds a bug
which version should be reported?
If people are not supposed to report bugs for daily builds what is the
point of having them uploaded to a public server?
If the goal of the buildbots is only to test if it is buildable, then
they only need to report success/failure.
Actually they are not changing daily... There hasn't been a successful
daily build (at least for Windows) for over a month (master or 4.1.x)
IMHO it doesn't make sense to be able to choose them as we then need
to ask everytime: Which x.y.z-dev version has been used?
People using daily builds are wise enough to report the Rev number (that
is why it is a selectable text in the About dialog). Day-to-day users
don't care about unstable daily builds and wouldn't install them anyway.
all corect. For this we have the "4.2.0-dev" item in the "Version"
field. However, I think it doesn't make sense to offer "...-dev" items
in the "Latest confirmation in" field.
Marcus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
