Am 14.10.2017 um 16:09 schrieb Marcus: > Am 14.10.2017 um 15:56 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Am 14.10.2017 um 15:39 schrieb Marcus: >>> With hash files of previous versions is was easily possible to check >>> the integrity of the download file with "sha256sum -c <file >>> name>.sha256". >>> >>> Now with 4.1.4 a relative path was added before the file name in the >>> hash files. Now it's a bit more complicated to get the same working. >>> As we are publishing the hash files for our users, it's also more >>> difficult for them to verify the install files. >>> >>> Was there a change in the build scripts? If so, it would be great to >>> improve them to get the old behavior back. >> >> While at it, we could also add support for SHA512. ;-) >> >> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127530 > > sure, adding this is necessary. But fixing the path problem should be > done, too.
This was meant by "also" ;-) Matthias > > Marcus > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
