Am 14.10.2017 um 22:39 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
All done.
great, thanks for the updates.
Marcus
On Oct 14, 2017, at 1:42 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
IMO, no need to redo the hash files. We can adjust the script
post-release to simply use basename, or whatever we want.
It's really a cosmetic issue, without any effects on the ongoing vote, but
indeed the instructions we give to users assume that the .md5 and .sha256 files
are in the form
e0b12ff2a19c18c24db844767c56d27e
*Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.4_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_it.tar.gz
and not (current version)
e0b12ff2a19c18c24db844767c56d27e
*./binaries/it/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.4_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_it.tar.gz
So no need to regenerate them at all, but a quick pass of sed over the RC5 tree
should rectify this and make it easier for users to test the hashes.
I can take care of it if needed; but if someone else is going to do it, even
better!
Regards,
Andrea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
