Am 14.10.2017 um 16:40 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Matthias Seidel wrote:
While at it, we could also add support for SHA512. ;-)
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127530
Yes, but while at it we could also... just fix the SHA256 bug and be
happy with it.
Every time we add some other change "while at it", this has side effects
on the rest of the process. For example, this specific "enhancement"
will break the instructions for the tree preparation for the SF area and
will require changes to the download pages.
We can have SHA512 starting from the next version (I mean 4.2.0). There
is no reason to pollute the RC5 tree when the vote is ongoing.
of course nobody wants anything new for 4.1.4. The first release we
integrate the improvements would be 4.2.0. ;-)
Of course, improved SHA256 hash files should instead be uploaded to the
RC5 tree since they are expected and fully supported by current tools.
This could be done but I don't expect updated files for 4.1.4.
Marcus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
