Matthias Seidel wrote:
While at it, we could also add support for SHA512. ;-) https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127530
Yes, but while at it we could also... just fix the SHA256 bug and be happy with it.
Every time we add some other change "while at it", this has side effects on the rest of the process. For example, this specific "enhancement" will break the instructions for the tree preparation for the SF area and will require changes to the download pages.
We can have SHA512 starting from the next version (I mean 4.2.0). There is no reason to pollute the RC5 tree when the vote is ongoing.
Of course, improved SHA256 hash files should instead be uploaded to the RC5 tree since they are expected and fully supported by current tools.
Regards, Andrea. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
