IMO, no need to redo the hash files. We can adjust the script post-release to simply use basename, or whatever we want.
> On Oct 14, 2017, at 12:55 PM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> > wrote: > > If we do want to correct the files, wouldn't it be the easiest way to > strip the relative paths and keep the hash? > I don't think we need completely new hash files... > > The script itself can be updated for future use afterwards. > > Matthias > > > Am 14.10.2017 um 18:09 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >> Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Don't get me wrong: >>> This is exacty what I meant and therefore the issue is for Target >>> Release 4.2.0 >> >> OK! Then I simply got it wrong... we are on the same page, good. >> >> Regards, >> Andrea. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
