> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] 
> Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2020 12:36 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: My last advance notice regarding Big Sur (was: 
> What we should do now)
> 
> Am 31.12.20 um 12:30 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
> >> Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2020 11:51 AM
> >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: My last advance notice regarding Big Sur (was:
> >> What we should do now)
> >>
> >> This is not how things are done. I read your mail as
> >> blackmail and toxic.
> > 
> > Then you are reading my email completly wrong, because it 
> follows the exact opposite path.
> > 
> > I have meticulously adhered to the applicable rules, even 
> in a situation where Mathias, for example, found it rather 
> annoying - because it seemed obvious to me that the reaction 
> of Mathias to the objection of "Bidouille" also wanted to 
> express that this objection actually has no substance.
> > 
> > 
> > WHAT I currently announce is no further than what anyone 
> here, even without announcement of anytime can do and does, 
> because I have never experienced that someone asks before 
> when editing the release notes (even _after_ the release) and 
> also I know no rule so requires something.
> 
> correcting typos or adding new translations has no a big 
> impact as your 
> addition would have.

I consider this statement objectively inaccurate and arbitrary.

I repeat that I have complied with the applicable rules and do absolutely 
nothing or demand what I would not have the right.



Jörg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to