Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Mathias Bauer wrote: >> The idea is the unification of pro and non-pro build. We have discussed >> that only as an idea to save time in release engineering and a nice >> opportunity for additional diagnostic abilities for customer problems, >> but maybe it can help in our current discussion also. >> > Please don't. stlport_debug mode has found so many serious (and > potentially serious, wrt. later code rework) errors, that I don't > want to miss it. Additionally, I have code in place for non-pro > builds that does similar expensive (in terms of runtime & space) > checks. If the build size/time is the problem, fix the root cause > (which you, personally, are already doing ;)).
Yes, stlport is one of the cons we have noted already, but without a clear idea how important it is. Thanks for your judgement. Indeed we considered the win in build time as not important enough to take the risk to lose something important. I only wanted to present this idea in the context discussed currently as it *could* help to find a compromise. OTOH the replies from you and Eike have shown us that most probably the potential pros are not big enough. Regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to "nospamfor...@gmx.de". I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
