Well the one thing I like with TestNG is the support for parametrized tests. With JUnit 4 this sucks greatly and it very easy with TestNG. I do think that we need parametrized tests as we do have a lot of options to test.
Chris Am 26.01.18, 09:39 schrieb "Mark Keinhörster" <[email protected]>: Hi Chris, I agree with Justin - I would prefer JUnit but would also be happy with whatever most people prefer. Thanks, Mark Keinhörster > Am 26.01.2018 um 09:35 schrieb Justin Mclean <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > >> yesterday I had to jump quite a number of hoops in order to update the poms because of the not really production ready support for Junit 5. >> Also I recall that Dale had problems with Junit 5 tests in Eclipse. > > I also had issues setting it up but once it was working it seemed fine. > >> My question now is, do we really need Junit 5? >> >> Initially I started creating PLC4X using TestNG as this brought all the features I needed and switched to Junit 5 because of strong feelings from parts of our group. > > I’d prefer JunitX (4 or 5) over TestNG but it’s not a strongly held view. i.e. enough people want to use TestNG then I’m good with that. > > So is using Junit4 a better option given it plays nicer with Maven? > > Thanks, > Justin >
